Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

人类历史社会发展价值观下的“粪便人生”

人类历史社会发展价值观下的“粪便人生”

Daohe · Sep 12, 2025

叙谈人生的意义与价值–看清粪便人生 历史是一条奔涌的长河,浩浩荡荡,不以个人意志为转移。在这个历史长河中,每一个人都身处于时代巨轮的碾压之下。有人燃烧自己,成为引擎的燃料,推动文明向前;有人则蜷缩在角落,不愿承担任何责任,最终被抛弃、被腐化,成为这个时代的粪便。前者留下力量,后者只剩恶臭。粪便,本是身体代谢的废物,不再具有营养和能量,只能被排出体外。若套用到人的一生,不论其自认为多么清高、多么善良,若未曾为时代的前行贡献力量,便注定被历史的胃肠道消化后丢弃。 一、动力的价值:文明的唯一尺度 在个人价值与社会价值的衡量中,道德、善恶、名誉,往往只是幻影。真正被历史认可的标准,只有一个:你是否提供了动力。动力不是抽象的,它体现在:  科技的探索者,让世界的认知边界不断拓展;科技动力:牛顿、爱因斯坦改变人类认知;硅谷创业者推动世界进入数字时代。 制度的建设者,让社会秩序更加稳固和公平;制度动力:美国宪法、法国人权宣言、北欧福利制度,让公民的权利被制度化。 文化的创造者,让人类的精神生活不断丰盈;文化动力:莎士比亚、陀思妥耶夫斯基、鲁迅,用文字刺破人心,点燃新的思想火种。 公益的践行者,让弱者也能在光中行走。公益动力:白求恩、特蕾莎修女、无数志愿者,在苦难之地让文明的光照亮弱者。 社会组织事业的践行者,让人都在组织中成长。社会动力:只有社会组织才是我们最小的社会单位,任何人在组织中才能发出最灿烂的创造之光。 动力是文明的燃料。哪怕只是一点火星,投入时代引擎,也能点亮无数未来。而没有动力的人,不是中立者,而是沉重的负担。 二、粪便的命运:无所作为者的归宿 在这个时代,许多人自以为善良,认为“不作恶就是好人”。然而,历史的标准从不以“善恶”来衡量一个人,而是以“贡献”来审视其价值。对应到人类社会,就是那些只消耗时代供养,却从不回馈时代的人。 无所作为的好人:他们自诩清白,不作恶,但也从不创造。他们的存在就像空气中的浮尘,随风消散,毫无痕迹。 自我沉溺的坏人:他们或许搅起浪花,但并未推动历史,只是被历史冲刷后腐烂。 冷漠的旁观者:他们不愿承受任何责任,以“中立”为借口,其实等同于自动退出文明进程。 历史不会因为你是“好人”就留名,也不会因为你“不坏”就赦免。论善恶,只要不提供时代动力,最终都将成为社会机器的排泄物,被淘汰,被遗忘,被历史嫌弃。 三、善恶之外:价值的真正判断 我们习惯把人分成“好人”和“坏人”,但历史的眼睛并不这样看。 一些所谓“坏人”,因推动了制度反思,反而间接成为动力。拿破仑虽是战争贩子,却带来《民法典》,成为现代法治的基石。 一些“好人”,因缺乏行动,反而湮没无闻。二战时期,欧洲数百万旁观者看着犹太人被屠杀,却无人伸手相助。他们或许“善良”,但历史只记住了抵抗者与解放者。 动力推动才文明的真正标准,而非善恶。历史要的,不是“道德标签”,而是“动力效应”。谁能让时代进步,谁就被铭记;谁若只消耗空气与粮食,就会化作粪便,随文明代谢被冲走。 四、历史的铁律:粪便总被冲走 纵观古今中外,粪便人生的命运早已昭示: 秦末农民:多数人选择苟且偷生,最终与暴政一同被湮没,唯有陈胜、吴广敢举义,才进入史册。 工业革命时期:成千上万工人机械般消耗生命,却毫无主体性,被机器和资本吞噬。最终,他们成了“被时代代谢”的一代,而提出工人权利的推动者,才被铭记。 二十世纪的冷漠者:无数国家里,那些既不反抗压迫,也不建设社会的人,活着如草芥,死后无一人记起。 文明只记住推动者,而不会记住无所作为的旁观者。   五、当代的警告:粪便人生正在泛滥 今天的世界,看似繁荣,却充斥着“粪便人生”: 把一生浪费在短视频麻醉与无意义消费上的人; 只顾个人安逸,却对公共事务冷漠的人; 只追求“清白”或“小确幸”,却拒绝承担责任的人。 他们或许自我感觉良好,甚至自诩为“好人”。但在文明视角下,他们与时代的引擎毫无关系,注定被未来冲走。 六、避免粪便人生的路径 东方中国两汉时期,司马迁在《报任安书》言:人固有一死,或重于泰山,或轻于鸿毛,用之所期、趋利异也。也给出了人生的价值取决于所追求的目标与意义,实际方法并不玄妙:1. 贡献哪怕一点点:在你的岗位上留下改进的痕迹,就是动力。2. 参与公共事务:哪怕只是为一次社区决策投票,也比冷漠旁观要强。3. 学习与创造:学习是吸收动力,创造是释放动力,两者缺一不可。4. 推动哪怕微小的文明进步:帮人守住诚信、传播知识、支持公益,支持社会组织事业都是点亮未来的火种。 哪怕贡献渺小,只要进入时代引擎,你的人生就有意义。唯有拒绝贡献的人,才会落得“粪便”的命运,被冲入下水道,臭气熏天,却无人愿再提起。 结语: 生命的意义,不在于你是否善良,不在于你是否清白,而在于你是否曾经给这个时代注入过哪怕一丝能量。动力有层级,但没有人被禁止提供。微小贡献的总和,正是文明前行的真正力量。 燃料之生,虽耗尽也光荣;粪便之生,虽自洁也卑贱。唯有成为动力,生命才能被文明吸收;否则,你只是历史的排泄物,臭气熏天,却无人再记起。

公務員の「制度の駒」としての人生:グローバルな制度進化における犠牲者の論理

公務員の「制度の駒」としての人生:グローバルな制度進化における犠牲者の論理

Daohe · Aug 30, 2025

――歴史、文明、制度を横断する、制度的統制の罠―― 序論:世界的な悲劇、制度的な設定 現代の多くの国々において、それが民主国家であれ、権威主義体制であれ、あるいは新興の政体であれ、「公務員」という集団の役割は、危険かつ逆説的な構造の中に囚われています。 忠誠を求められながら、清廉潔白でいられる余地を与えられない。 権力を与えられながら、その人格の尊厳は保障されない。 秩序を維持するよう求められながら、いつでも身代わりの羊(スケープゴート)にされうる。 このような「制度の駒として使われる人生」は、東洋特有のものでも、権威主義体制の専売特許でもありません。これは、世界の制度文明が長期にわたって進化してきた副産物であり、行政官僚システムそのものに固有の、犠牲を生み出すメカニズムなのです。そして、それは世界的な普遍性と、制度としての継承性を持っています。 一、古代帝国から植民地体制へ:公務員の「犠牲となる」性質の世界的起源 1. 古代ローマとペルシャ帝国:忠実な道具 vs. 権力による収穫 古代ローマ帝国は、世界で最も初期の巨大な文官システムの一つを確立しました。しかし、このシステムの核心的な論理は、「実行者に権限はなく、責任は全て負わされる」というものでした。地方総督が治安維持、徴税、軍糧供給をできなければ、元老院に弾劾され、職務怠慢で追放され、時には街頭で処刑される可能性さえありました。 ペルシャ帝国も同様で、その「帝国の目」と呼ばれた監察官は、高い地位にありながら、皇帝の「耳目」であると同時に「生贄」でもありました。一度でも忠誠心に疑いを持たれれば、まず処刑され、その後に責任が問われる、という具合でした。 2. 中世の教会権力と王権のシステム:官僚が置かれた高圧的な苦境 中世西ヨーロッパの王権と教会権力が並立していた時代、王室の書記官や教皇庁の助祭長は、最高位の公務員でありながら、最も高いリスクを背負う者たちでもありました。主君のために働いた多くの高級行政官が、権力闘争、責任転嫁、そして世論による断罪の中で命を落としました。 イングランドのトマス・ベケットのように、忠臣でありながら、最終的には「政治的な死体」となる例は少なくありません。 3. 植民地システム:派遣された官僚が陥る二重の牢獄 イギリス、フランス、オランダ、スペインといった植民地帝国は、世界中に多くの植民地行政官を派遣しました。彼らは「現地住民を平定し、税を搾り取る」一方で、本国の議会や現地の資本家の機嫌を損ねるわけにはいきませんでした。彼らは、植民地での危機、反乱の失敗、経済の衰退といった事態において、しばしば「最初の犠牲者」となったのです。 世界の植民地史における「不運な総督たち」の記録は、制度が人材をいかに「燃料」として消費してきたかを、最も如実に物語っています。 二、近代国家の「行政機械」:権力の中で人格を奪われる人々 1. ナチス・ドイツとソビエト体制:制度の消耗品としての究極形態 全体主義制度の下では、公務員はほとんど制度の消耗品と化します。 このような政体における公務員は、表向きは国家を代表していますが、実態は高圧的な権力システムにおける最初の犠牲者集団なのです。 2. 民主国家におけるスケープゴート構造:世論の下での切り捨てメカニズム 制度が成熟した民主国家においてさえ、公務員は「切り捨てられる運命」から逃れられてはいません。 民主制度が必ずしも穏やかであるとは限りません。ただ、公務員を切り捨てる方法が、より「文明的」であるに過ぎないのです。 三、現代における「制度の駒」としての人生の五大特徴:世界共通の「統制パッケージ」 どの国においても、今日の公務員システムは、非常によく似た、管理しやすい「制度の駒」としての構造的特徴を示しています。 1. 権力と責任の著しい非対称性 限られた実行権しか持たないにもかかわらず、政策の失敗、世論の批判、予算の危機に対して責任を負わなければなりません。真の意思決定者は「法的に免責」され、実行者は「手続きに則って問責」されます。 2. 収入と期待の著しい乖離 世界の多くの国で、公務員の収入は、その仕事の過酷さや公衆からの期待に見合うものではありません。その結果、合法的な範囲外のインセンティブ、すなわち「グレーな収入」を生み出す土壌となります。 3. 忠誠と独立した人格の両立不可能性 多くの国で、「政治的中立」と「制度への忠誠」はしばしば矛盾します。ある公務員があまりに独立して思考すれば、「非協力的な人物」と見なされやすく、逆に従順すぎれば、社会からの信頼を失います。 4. 制度によって腐敗へと誘導され、そして制度によって粛清される 制度は、表向きは清廉潔白を奨励しますが、実際には管理・統制の手段として、多くの「腐敗の余地」を残しています。そして、一度、粛清の必要が生じると、その中から「スケープゴート」を選び出し、不満を鎮めるのです。 5. 最終的に社会の怒りの受け皿となる 貧富の格差、統治の失敗、官僚主義的な作風に対する民衆の不満は、最終的に、資本家や体制の上層部ではなく、「無能で、腐敗し、怠慢で、愚かで、何もしない」公務員へと集中砲火のように浴びせられます。 四、なぜ制度は常に「切り捨て可能な実行部隊」を必要とするのか? 制度は、常に三つの重要な難題を解決しなければなりません。 問題 制度対策 実行効率をいかに維持するか? 体制に従順で、依存的な人々を育成する。 制度の安定性をいかに延長するか? […]

read more

Related Content

Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
View All Content