Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society

How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society

Yicheng · May 10, 2025

A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]

如何建设一个高效且黑暗的深渊社会

Yicheng · May 10, 2025

——人人皆可被愚弄、被剥削、被欺压却又无力反抗的体制之道 在人类文明的长河中,建设一个“理想的深渊社会”从来不是幻想,它们的原型散落在历史与现实之中,形式不同,内核相似。 若真有人要设计这样一个社会,有三个基本原则必须牢牢把握:利出一孔、政出一孔、吏出一孔。以下,便是构建深渊的三道铁律。 一、利出一孔,天下我有 金钱,是现代社会中权力与自由最基本的单位。一个人能否做出独立选择,在很大程度上取决于他是否具备基本的经济能力。住房、教育、医疗、职业选择,甚至表达意见的自由,背后都依赖于一定程度的财务自主。因此,剥夺经济上的余地,正是限制社会自由最有效的手段之一。 总之,一个深渊社会,绝不能让底层人民掌握经济主动权。 持底层长期的经济脆弱状态,并非偶然,而是一种结构性的安排。当人们缺乏积蓄、负债累累、生活不稳时,他们很难有时间和精力去思考社会结构的问题,更遑论参与改变。每天为生存奔忙,成为他们生活的全部。 而这并非靠暴力维持,而是通过复杂系统悄然完成,因为资源的分配权只能集中在极少数手中:税收政策偏向资本方、公共资源分配失衡、教育制度强化服从、金融与房产制造负担……每一个看似中性的制度设计,都在无形中将经济资源不断向上集中。 当所有人都在为“温饱”“学区房”“社保”“还贷”挣扎,他们就不会再有多余的力气去思考什么是自由、什么是公平。于是他们就老实了,甘于做牛做马,甚至还感谢你给他们一口草料。 二、政出一孔,唯我独尊 堵住政治梦想,只需要将公民变成被规训的羔羊。 深渊社会最大的敌人,不是枪炮,而是公民意识的广泛觉醒。一旦普通人意识到自己拥有集体行动与政治参与的能力,权力的合法性就不再稳固。因此,阻断政治参与的路径,成为维系统治的核心策略之一。 这种阻断并非靠强制,而是从文化、教育、舆论和心理机制多方面逐层推进的。 这种长期的信息与认知塑造,结果并不是一代人的沉默,而是一代人的“政治想象力缺失”。人们不再能设想集体表达、民主协商、公共行动为何物,更难以信任他人、联合他人。个体逐渐原子化,失去了形成社会力量的能力。 最终,公民身份被解构为“顺从个体”——不再关心制度如何运转,只关心自己如何避免被伤害。这种状态下,即使社会存在普遍不公,也缺乏足够的动员力去推动改变。 无需镇压,无需枪弹,系统便能持续运转——因为人们早已放弃了争取改变的可能性。 三、吏出一孔,我即天命 培养“可控人才”,让内耗成为制度惯性。 一个高度集中的权力系统,若要长期维持稳定,必须建立一套忠诚于体制、而非忠诚于人民的官僚架构。在这样的机制中,那些具备独立判断、有公共责任感、敢于发声的人,往往被排斥在核心之外。相反,制度更偏好所谓的“可控人才”——那些对权力高度依附、在利益面前毫无底线的人。 他们有的人沉迷权势,有的人贪恋金钱,有的人陷于私欲;这些“弱点”恰恰使他们容易被操控。制度将他们推上各级权力岗位,在地方成为“父母官”,在单位成为“一把手”,被赋予类父权式的威信,使基层民众不得不对其顺从服从。 更深层的策略是制造结构性的分裂与竞争。部门之间设置重叠权限,地方与中央留有博弈空间,官员之间资源分配不均,迫使他们在制度框架内不断“内卷”。这种人为的内耗机制,使各级官员被迫消耗大量精力于相互防范和争夺有限资源,而无暇凝聚共识或推动改革。 而在一片混乱中,掌权者只需偶尔“出面调解”,便可收买人心、立威树信。人们反而会感激这个“秩序的仲裁者”,哪怕正是他创造了混乱的根源。正如古语所言:“天下悠悠,犹如掌中。” 尾声:深渊的艺术 建设一个“高效且黑暗无力反抗”的社会,并不需要高科技,也不需要战争与屠杀。只需要掌握人性:让他们恐惧、内斗、贫穷、自我否定、彼此怀疑,而后,再给一点点希望、糖衣、精神鸦片。 如此,便能让亿万人沦为沉默羔羊,在深渊中行走,却以为头顶有光,脚下有路。 真正的地狱,并非烈火,而是一个人人适应、人人接受、人人不再反抗的世界。

read more

Related Content

Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
View All Content