Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

漫谈阶级剥削社会的一些现象

Master Wonder · Mar 24, 2025

一旦进入私有制与权力结构阶段,阶级剥削便成为无法避免的现象。从古代奴隶社会到现代资本主义,从专制帝国到金融垄断时代,剥削从未消失,只是形式更加隐蔽,手段更加精致。 阶级剥削社会不仅是一种财富与权力的不平等分配结构,更是一种通过制度、文化、法律、精神、经济多重锁链打造出来的牢笼。 从古至今,阶级剥削一直是人类无法回避的社会课题。只要有一群人掌握了权力,就会有另一帮人面临被剥削的下场。 阶级是一个精心设计的系统,目的就是为了巩固某一群人的统治,并通过制度化的分工、资源分配和文化塑造,使其他人难以逾越阶级壁垒。 统治阶级不仅掌控经济和政治权力,还通过教育、价值观传播和社会规范的建立,将自身地位合理化,使被统治者接受现有秩序,并在潜移默化中认同阶级分层的“必然性”,从而确保其长期稳定和利益最大化。 直到现代社会,这种刻意的制度设计依然存在,从法律、政治、经济到文化宣传,各个层面都在维护既有阶级结构: 阶级社会的本质是权力与财富的双重垄断,使广大的底层人民为了一点生存资源疲于奔命,无力抗争。 一、不允许公民产生,自然缺乏政治权力 在阶级剥削社会里,普通人只能是臣民、工具和资源,而非独立的公民。政治权力和制度设计完全服务于极少数阶层,公民权利被阉割,只留下形式化的“参与”仪式。 历史上,无论是罗马庞大的奴隶体系,还是中国封建社会中科举制度带来的有限上升渠道,都在一定程度上维系了社会的阶层分化。表面上这些制度给予了底层个体改变命运的希望,但实际上,它们是统治阶级用来维持社会稳定的机制,让大多数人接受自己的位置,而不会真正威胁既有秩序。 在现代社会,资本主义民主制度赋予了大众投票权,但现实中,经济权力往往左右政治进程。资本掌控媒体、政策制定和公共舆论,使选举更像是一场由既得利益者主导的表演,而非真正的公民决策。 与此同时,阶级社会中的权力者往往将资源视作自己的专属资产,哪怕是政府推行公共福利或企业提高薪资,也常伴随精心塑造的话语体系,使受益者感恩戴德,仿佛任何改善都是恩赐,而非社会公平的一部分。这种思维延续了古代“雷霆雨露,皆是天恩”的逻辑,使权力者在控制资源的同时,塑造出施惠者的形象,从而巩固其统治地位。 二、法律与制度:装饰与武器 1. 阶级社会中法律的本质:塑造平等的幻象 法律的存在本应确保社会公平与正义,但在阶级分化严重的社会中,法律的适用往往因身份、地位和资源而有所不同。 在历史上,许多法律对普通民众施加了严格的约束,而对统治阶层则宽容甚至网开一面。例如,欧洲中世纪的封建制度中,贵族可以用罚金替代刑罚,而农奴和普通百姓则可能因微小的犯罪被严厉惩罚。 现代社会虽然建立了法治框架,并推行三权分立等制度,但在现实运作中,法律的执行仍受到资本与权力的影响。例如: 法律作为社会秩序的重要基石,理应超越阶级和财富的影响。然而,在现实中,资源和权力的分配往往决定了法律的适用方式。 法庭判决、执法行动乃至制度改革,虽然在程序上遵循法律,但在某些情况下,其实际效果可能更多地维护既得利益者的稳定,而非实现真正的公平与正义。 2. 法律和政治表演加剧社会分歧 法律体系的复杂性和冗长的程序可能使普通民众对体制改革抱有期待,但在现实中,变革往往进展缓慢,甚至可能被既得利益者所阻碍,导致公众在希望与失望之间循环。 另一方面,政治舆论的运作方式也常常加剧社会对立。在一些国家,媒体和社交平台上的信息战使公众聚焦于群体分歧,而忽略更深层次的社会结构性问题。例如,在经济不平等加剧的背景下,舆论可能将焦点转向身份政治、文化争议等议题,使不同社会群体之间的矛盾被放大,而真正影响社会公平的问题则被边缘化。 政客最擅长通过操控舆论、挑动矛盾,使百姓内部互斗,从而破坏社会的凝聚力,而有权者则坐收渔利。 三、治理手段:蠢才、奴才与权谋 阶级剥削体制下绝不会容忍有智慧、有独立思想的人掌握实权。蠢才容易控制,奴才唯命是从,这两类人成为管理机器的齿轮。他们的愚昧与残酷,正是剥削阶级需要的武器。 所有致力于巩固自己统治的人都会培养一批爪牙。历史上,东汉宦官、明朝厂卫、清朝八旗子弟、欧洲宫廷政客,无不体现这一点。这些群体不仅享有特权,还负责压制异己、操控舆论,甚至执行秘密行动,以确保统治秩序不被动摇。 剥削阶层深知,最大的威胁来自于底层团结和中间力量的崛起。因而,他们不断制造分化:在政治上,离间与自己权力对立的另一方;在社会上,鼓动地域、阶层、性别、族群矛盾,让社会碎片化,失去整体抵抗力。 四、经济与金融:贫穷是精心设计的陷阱 1. 用经济与金融手段限制民众的富裕 贫穷在阶级剥削体制中往往成为控制社会的有效工具。通过高税收、高房价、高通胀和债务陷阱等手段,普通民众被迫维持在“温饱线”附近,难以突破经济困境,导致人们无暇思考或反抗,只能应对日常生计。现代金融体系中的“消费主义”也可能引导过度透支,使得个人深陷债务,陷入经济压力,限制了他们的自由和选择。 2. 用强权手段进行频繁的骚扰与征收 在古代,苛捐杂税就像割肉般让民众苦不堪言;而在现代,行政乱收费、强制罚款以及政策频繁变化常常成为对百姓的额外负担。表面理由是“治理优化”,实质是掠夺式收割。频繁变化的政策使得民众常处于不安定状态,甚至出现“疲劳型社会”的现象,影响了个人和家庭的正常生活。 五、精神控制:双重鸦片与文化毒素 1. 以欲望为引诱塑造社会价值观 阶级剥削不仅体现在物质层面的压迫,还表现在对精神的控制。上层通过塑造“荣华富贵”和“权力至上”的理想,激发人们对体制的依赖,甚至让他们幻想能够成为统治阶层的一部分。 炫富文化和成功学的传播,使得底层民众渴望成为“上层社会”的一员。这种文化和价值观的塑造是一种隐性的引导,将人们的关注和追求集中于权力和财富,使个体对上层阶级产生精神上的认同,而无法看清楚自己失权的现状。 2. 文化中对剥削的美化与洗脑 剥削阶级不只是用暴力统治,更擅长用文化毒素维系统治。古代有“君权神授”、“三纲五常”;现代有“亿万富翁故事”、“个人奋斗神话”。 主流教育和媒体刻意回避结构性剥削,只鼓吹“努力改变命运”,制造“内卷”社会。底层人互相竞争、相互内耗,永远找不到真正的问题所在。 结语:阶级剥削的最终代价和反思 剥削社会看似稳定,其实脆弱无比。当经济崩溃、精神混乱、底层彻底绝望时,文明便走向坍塌。历史证明,任何一个极端剥削体系,最终都毁于自身累积的腐烂与愚昧。 真正的文明,应该以尊重人性、保障公平为基础;真正的法律,应服务于公民而非特权;真正的政治,应促成团结而非离间。 为此,我们提出了“社会公民社会”的理念与解决方案。社会公民社会有着深远的潜力,有望实现政治、经济、教育与法治的真正平等。它不仅是一种理念,更是一种实践,它将社会事务的主导权归还给公民,赋予每个人参与决策、影响变化的能力,从而打破现有的权力结构,推动更为公平与包容的社会发展。 唯有如此,文明才能真正延续,而不再在剥削与崩溃的轮回中沉沦。

「正道」、「邪道」と「悪道」とは?

「正道」、「邪道」と「悪道」とは?

Yicheng · Mar 21, 2025

昔から現代に至るまで、「道」は人類文明にとって常に重要なテーマでした。宗教、哲学や社会の仕組みなど、さまざまな領域で「正道は何か」「大道とは何か」「邪な道や悪い道との違いは何か」といった問いが問い続けられています。 これらの問いは、個人の生き方や選択だけでなく、社会の運営や人類文明の未来にも深く関わる問題です。本稿では、「道」とは何かをわかりやすく解説し、私たちがより幸せな人生を歩むための指針を示します。 一.正しい道は、多くの人の幸せにつながる道 正しい道の基本原則は「みんなの幸せを大切にすること」です。もし一人ひとりが自分の利益だけでなく、周りの人々の幸せをしっかり考え、そのために力を尽くすなら、そこに正しい道があるといえるでしょう。 ここでいう「幸せ」とは、物質的な充足や社会の公正、精神的な悟りなど、豊かな生活を支えるあらゆる要素を含みます。 1.人類文明が受け継いできた正道思想 歴史上、多くの思想や体系が正道を探求してきました。たとえば: これらの思想は、ただ個人の成長や幸せのみを追求するのではなく、より正しい考え方を通じて社会や未来世代に役立つ選択を促し、人々が限りある人生を豊かに全うすることを目指している点で共通しています。 2.正道の実践:制度づくりと社会の発展 物質的な世界で正しい道を実践しようとするなら、哲学的な思索だけでなく、具体的な制度づくりや社会的な取り組みが欠かせません。たとえば: 3.正道の課題:机上の空論を防ぐために 正道が幸せへの正解に近いものであっても、実際に形にするうえでは多くの障害があります。 こうした問題を乗り越えるには、単なる理想論に終わらせず、知恵を絞りながら一歩一歩着実に行動し、忍耐強く続けていくことが大切です。 二、邪道:目標を見誤った道 正道と悪道の違いを考えるとき、その中間に位置する「邪道」にも目を向ける必要があります。邪道は必ずしも悪意のみで成り立つわけではなく、そこを進む人々がある程度の理想や目標を抱いている場合も多いのです。むしろ「自分は幸せに向かっている」と思い込みながら、選んだ道が誤っていたがために、最終的に本当の幸せから遠ざかり、逆の方向に進んでしまうケースが邪道の特徴です。 邪道が危険なのは、「正義」や「発展」の名を掲げ、多くの人を惹きつける力がある一方で、その結末として大きな惨事を引き起こす可能性が高い点です。 以下に邪道の主な特徴を挙げます: 1. 個人レベルにおける邪道:欲望の暴走と誤った誘導 人生の目標として多くの人は幸せを望むものの、歪んだ価値観を持ていたり、思い込みや社会の誘惑に流されたりして、近道に見える極端な手段に走る場合があります。結果として道を踏み外してしまう代表的な例は次のとおりです。 物欲至上:富を究極の目標にする 極端な功利主義:手段と目的を取り違える 盲目的な信仰:極端思想によるコントロール 2. 社会レベルにおける邪道:正道から逸脱した発展モデル 国家や社会の規模になると、邪道はさらに複雑化します。誤ったガバナンスモデルや極端な社会制度、持続可能性を欠いた成長戦略などがその例です。 極端な政治体制:よい理念が歪んだ形で実行される 経済的発展の偏り:短期の繁栄が長期的な危機をもたらす 文化的偏り:社会全体の価値観を誤った方向に導く 3. 邪道の結果:偽りの繁栄と崩壊 邪道が最も恐ろしいのは、短期的には合理的に見えたり、繁栄のようなものをもたらしたりする点です。しかし、根本が誤っているために、最終的には重大な危機を引き起こします。 邪道は一見近道のように思えて、実は長期的な苦痛と失敗をもたらす道です。私たちは常に警戒心を持ち、短期的なメリットや幻の繁栄に惑わされないよう注意しなければなりません。 4. 邪道に陥らないためには? 邪道には強い誘惑や紛らわしさがある以上、どうすれば自分自身を守れるのでしょうか?以下のように、個人の認知力・社会制度・文化の3つの観点で対策を講じることが重要です。 邪道は災難へ続く「近道」で、持続性はありません。 個人が邪道に溺れると、本当の幸せを失い、社会が邪道に進めば、最終的には危機や崩壊に直面することになります。 三、悪道:欺きと略奪の道 社会の発展の過程では、人々の幸せを目指すどころか、騙しや搾取によって他人の幸せを奪う勢力も存在します。 邪道が「何らかの理想」を掲げながら道を誤るケースだとすれば、悪道はそもそもの発想から「他者の幸福など考えていない」どころか、人々を意図的に苦しめることで利益を得ようとする点に特徴があります。 悪道の本質的な特徴は以下のとおりです。 1. 人間関係における悪道の典型例 2. 社会レベルの悪道:システム化された搾取 悪道が社会全体を巻き込む場合、単なる個人の詐欺ではなく、社会の仕組みとして多数を犠牲にし、少数が利益を独占する構造を作り上げます。 政治的悪道:独裁と専制による搾取 経済的悪道:資本と権力の結託による搾取 文化的悪道:娯楽至上や精神操作 歴史上のあらゆる悪道によるシステムは、短期的には多大な権力や富を手にしても、その内在的な不公平と不安定さゆえに、最終的には崩壊しています。 悪道は短期間の利益を生む可能性があるものの、人間社会の根本的ルールに反するため、いずれ必ず滅びに向かいます。私たちは悪道の本質を見抜き、その罠に陥らないよう努めなければなりません。 四、どのように正道を歩むのか? 邪道や悪道の脅威が存在するなかで、正道を歩み続けるためにはどうすればよいでしょうか。これは個人の生き方という範囲を超え、国家運営や人類文明の行方を左右する重要な課題でもあります。 正道を貫くには、「知恵」「制度」「実践」が一体となることが必要です。 […]

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
View All Content