Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Freedom and Happiness or Servitude? 2 Paths in Life

Freedom and Happiness or Servitude? 2 Paths in Life

Yicheng · Mar 2, 2025

On life’s long journey, each of us constantly faces choices — choices that ultimately shape our destiny. At the core, these choices often boil down to two distinct paths: one that chases wealth, fame, and material success, and another that seeks inner freedom and happiness, democracy and peace. Many people mistakenly believe that wealth and […]

人生最美的创作,为所有人的幸福奋斗

Yicheng · Mar 2, 2025

人生方向的两条路:奴役之路与幸福之路 在人生的漫长旅途上,我们每个人都不断面对选择,而这些选择最终决定了我们的命运。选择的核心常常呈现为两条截然不同的道路:一条是追求财富、名利和外在物质的道路,另一条则是追求内心自由、幸福与民主的道路。 许多人误以为财富和金钱是通往幸福的唯一途径,但这种观念常常将我们引入深深的陷阱。真正的富有并非来自物质的堆砌,而是源自于内心的自由和对大道的深刻领悟。 奴役之路:财富与自由的交换 在很多社会,财富几乎被视为成功的唯一标准,拥有财富似乎意味着拥有一切,包括自由、尊严和幸福。这种观念被无数广告、媒体、以及成功学所推崇,从小到大,我们被不断灌输着“有钱即自由”的理念。然而,追求财富的过程实际上往往是以自由换取奴役的过程。 表面上钱能为我们带来自由的选择和优越的生活,实际上很多人在以健康和大量时间的代价换取薪水。在这个过程中,我们得到了钱,但我们很可能会失去健康、梦想、探索其他选择的时间和精力。 还有一些人,为了维持财富,投入大量时间、精力,甚至牺牲自己的道德底线,变成了体制中的一颗棋子。 许多看似成功的商人和企业家,外表光鲜亮丽,但内心却充满了焦虑、压力与不安。为了赚钱、为了维持地位,他们失去了自己的初衷,日复一日地忙碌于无休止的竞争与压力之中。 《浮士德》中的主人公通过与魔鬼交易,换取了财富与名利,但最终丧失了自己的灵魂和自由。这种精神上的堕落正是财富追求的宿命:它让人失去了自己,也让人陷入无法自拔的困境。 财富的积累,虽然表面上为我们带来更多选择,却往往让我们失去了很多生命本真的乐趣与自由。在此,我们并不是说赚钱是一种错误的行为,现代社会每个人都需要谋生,但是我们应该清晰地看到追求金钱对人性的异化,才有动力去追求更加幸福的生活方式。 幸福之路:自由、民主与内心的安宁 与财富的追求相对,幸福的道路则是由自由、民主和内心的平和所铺就的。 这条路的核心并不在于外在物质的积累,而在于内心的自由与对生命真谛的理解。真正的幸福来源于深刻的自我认识和对内心自由的追求,源于对自身价值的确信,源于对世界的爱。 古希腊哲学家苏格拉底提出了“认识你自己”的命题,指引我们走向自我觉醒与深刻的内心探索。幸福的道路并非追求财富、名利和外在的事物,而是从内心深处对自己与世界的关系产生深刻理解和接纳。 自由作为幸福的基础,不在于随心所欲地支配他人或随波逐流,而是有独立的思想,能够掌控自己内心的世界,不惧外界的评判,做出真正属于自己的选择。 真正的幸福并非一条简单的自我放纵的道路,而是来源于选择的自由。我们每个人都可以在生活中找到平静与自我实现,而非依赖金钱和外在的标准来证明自己。 幸福的人以人为本,认识到本自具足。而迷失的人往往被金钱物化,以利益为本,忽略了人自身的价值。 当然,每个人的幸福都需要社会环境的支持。一个社会的民主制度和社会福利系统为每个公民提供了自由的表达和保障,支持人们选择更多样化的生活方式,保证人们在不受外界压迫的情况下,能够追求属于自己的幸福。 例如,芬兰的全民基本收入实验了持续两年,政府每月无条件向2000名失业者发放560欧元。实验结束后发现,这些人整体的心理健康和生活满意度明显提升,经济压力减少后,一些人开始主动学习新技能,甚至尝试过去不敢碰的工作或小型创业。这项实验不仅带来了数据和结果,也让人看到了社会福利对于保障个人幸福感的重要性。 财富与幸福的关系:副产品与陷阱 财富本身并无善恶之分,它是生活中必不可少的工具,能够为人们提供便利和选择。然而,当人们本末倒置,把财富当成唯一的目标时,它便会变成生活的束缚,让我们失去对真正幸福的追求。 我们经常看到,那些在物质上取得巨大成功的人,常常在精神上感到空虚与孤独。许多历史人物和现代成功人士都意识到,金钱并不是通往幸福的终极路径。比如霍华德·休斯,他是20世纪最富有、最成功的企业家之一,掌控航空、电影等多个产业,财富无数。但他晚年却极度孤独,长期封闭在酒店房间里,饱受精神疾病折磨,甚至对世界充满恐惧。 再比如稻盛和夫,他不仅在事业上取得了巨大成功,还非常重视精神修行,一生都在思考人生的意义和人的本质。他提出的“敬天爱人”哲学,把商业和道德紧密结合,认为真正的成功不是财富,而是灵魂的成长和对社会的贡献。 在幸福的道路上,财富更多是副产品。它不是目的,而是使人生更加丰富多彩的工具。正如西方哲学家海德格尔所说:“人的存在,不在于拥有,而在于成为。” 真正的幸福来自于内心的觉醒和自我价值的实现,而财富只是这个过程中自然获得的附带物。 结语:走向幸福的选择 在人生的旅途上,每个人都将在两条路之间做出选择:以利为本,还是以人为本? 我们可以选择追求财富,渴望名利,最终可能陷入欲望的漩涡,成为金钱的奴隶;也可以选择追求自由与内心的幸福,尽管这条路上没有耀眼的金光闪烁,但却充满了平静与满足。 历史和哲学的智慧告诉我们,财富并非人生的全部,真正的自由和幸福才是我们应当追求的目标。 在这两条道路的选择中,关键在于内心的觉悟。当我们不再为外界的标准所迷惑,走向内心的自由时,幸福便自然而然地随之而来。 财富虽然可以成为生活的一部分,但它永远不能是我们存在的目的。 那些为了财富而迷失自我的人,正是世界上那些“沾满灰尘”的人。他们把所有的精力投入到物质的追逐中,忘记了内心的追求。最终,他们可能获得了财富,但却丧失了真正的自由和幸福。 真正的智慧,是看清这两条道路的区别,选择通向自由与幸福的道路,完成人生最美的创作,为所有人的幸福奋斗不息。

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
View All Content