Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

修行,就是不断的培养善,深入善

Daohe · Oct 28, 2024

许多人认为,修行是寻求内心平静、智慧与觉悟的过程。在这个过程中,善是基本的要求。然而,很多人对善还存在着根本的误解。善不是单一的行为,而是一种自内而外的深刻信念,是我们内心对他人和世界无条件的爱。这份爱让我们不断扩展与深入善,让善行成为生活中自然的流露与表达。 善的源头:内心的爱 很多人对善的理解停留在表面,导致认知和行动的误区。有些人认为的善是一种示弱,还有些人认为只要不伤害别人,就是一种善。这些都是对善的错误定义。真正的善来自内心对他人、对世界的无条件的关爱与祝福。如果缺少这份爱,善往往只是一种自保行为,也可能是为了融入社会、迎合环境的表面努力,只是一种伪善。只有当我们发自内心去关爱和祝福世界中的每一个生命,善才会成为一种发自本能的举动,并超越了外界的认可与回报。这种善是一种灵魂深处的力量,是对生命的尊重与呵护,是对世界的真诚关怀。这种善可以让人在复杂的情境中保持纯粹,穿透自私和偏见的层层障碍,而不会迷失,能让人坚定地面对世间的邪恶与冷漠。 长养善根:善的层次与成长 佛教常言“长养善根”,意指善良如种子一般,需要不断地探索、发展、扩大与深化。善并非固定的状态,它就像是一株小苗,需要不断的关注、反思与行动的滋养。当一个人能够扩大自己原先的善,就会看到善是有层次的,如同剥一个洋葱,有些善行只停留于表面,往下剥竟然是恶,而有些善行从发心到行为都是出自纯粹的善意与爱。从某种意义上说,修行的过程也是不断长养善根的过程。每一次善念的出现,每一次善行的实践,都是在为我们的善根提供养分,让它日渐深厚、枝繁叶茂。 信仰与内在力量 在行善的过程中,这需要我们不断地反思善的内涵,同时深入理解善的复杂性,理解善并非固定的概念,而是因时而定,因人而异。我们需要借助信仰的力量,使善行不再是偶尔的努力,而是成为我们生命本质的一部分。信仰帮助我们理解善的真实意义,使得以打破自身的局限,超越自私与惰性,走向一个更广阔的世界。 每当我们在修行中发现更高层次的善,看到更大范围的利他方式,就等于在心中开辟了一条新的道路。在这个过程中,我们的视野逐渐拓宽,看待世界的善与恶更加清晰,真正做到明了是非,才能做出正确的行动。这样的善并非局限于个人利益,而是对他人和整个世界的积极关怀。通过修行,我们在点滴的反思和行动中实现了善良的升华,也将在善行中真正做到有效关爱他人,推动社会的进步。

中国将迎来“学难潮”

Daohe · Oct 27, 2024

随着AI技术的迅速发展,全球教育正逐渐转向以文化教育为重心,强调综合素质与能力,以适应未来的社会需求。在这种背景下,传统的知识教育逐渐失去市场,全球教育重心逐渐转入素质教育,即文化与文明教育,知识教育将逐渐成为保障性教育。而目前中国的教育体系依然以应试教育为主,学生们依然在死磕学科知识,以考试成绩作为唯一的学习目标。在这种封闭的知识教育体系中,人们越努力学,越会陷入各方面落后的境地,培养出来的知识技术人才和其他专业人才在国际上将面临“学难潮”。“学难潮”重灾区主要是的对外交流,在工作、留学、学术研究、文化交流、贸易等等领域上表现尤为突出。 首先,中国的教育体系在应试教育的驱动下,学生的学习往往围绕着分数展开。这种以成绩为导向的方式使得知识体系相对滞后,许多与知识学习无关的技能发展受到限制。随着全球市场对人才素质需求的多样化,许多中国学生在国际职场中可能会面临竞争力不足的问题。其他国家在教育改革上不断升级,全球教育方向朝文化教育、共享教育转变,而中国的人才培养自封闭落后的知识教育体系,很可能因未能与国际标准接轨而被逐渐排斥和淘汰,这一趋势已经初见端倪。 其次,文化交流的障碍日益明显。中国教育体系中缺乏公民教育和文明素质教育,导致许多人才在自由、民主和平等的普世价值观上与国际社会存在明显差距。这种文明思想的鸿沟使得许多中国人在与国际人士沟通时感到难以融入。尽管他们在语言上可以适应,但思维方式和交流习惯上与国际文化存在差距。这种文化差异使得他们在参与全球对话时遇到困难,可能难以有效表达自己的观点或理解他人的立场,进而影响了自己在职场中的形象和影响力。而这种现象的普遍性,又将影响中国人在国际社会中的整体形象。 在政治层面,国际社会对中国人的态度也在悄然变化。许多国家的民众对中国人的文化、社会行为以及经济发展等方面的理解逐渐加深,但这种认知并不总是积极的。很多人对中国持有负面情绪看法,甚至部分国家开始制定政策,以限制中国公民的居住,旅游和工作权利。 此外,还有历史遗留因素的影响。中国人曾因一些不诚实的行为而遭到国际社会的反感,这样的印象在某种程度上依然影响着今天的中国。诚信问题在国际交往和贸易中至关重要,过去的负面经历使得中国人在国外的形象非常复杂,使得很多人无法发自内心地信任中国人。而中国人又在这种交往中感到备受歧视,造成内心对文化融入的抵触。在商贸往来和日常交往中,这种负面的印象无形中增添了中国人与其他国家人民之间的隔阂。 最后,由于中国国内民众长期无法与外界直接沟通,信息来源相对单一,导致他们对国际社会的认知存在一定程度的误解。在这种情况下,部分人士在公开场合表达的声音,往往缺乏对国际形势和文化差异的深刻理解。这些声音传到世界后,可能因过于片面或极端而引起反感,给民众留下不良印象。 这种情况不仅加剧了国际社会的误解,也让那些希望深入了解中国的友好人士感到无力与困惑。许多人在面对这些言论时,难以理解其背后的意图和背景,从而产生距离感和误解,加剧了彼此的疏远。 这种误解可能会阻碍文化交流和相互理解,使中国人在国际舞台上的形象变得更加复杂。 综上所述,中国将面临的“学难潮”不仅是教育体系的问题,更是文化、政治和历史等多方面因素共同导向的结果。为了中华民族在全球化的浪潮中更好地立足与发展。正视问题,遇见问题,才能有效避免问题的发生。但愿我们不会发生“学难潮”。这是我们所有人都不希望看到的结果。希望我们文化复兴的道路更加壮阔,更加美好,更加有希望,我们公益也为此目标而努力奋斗。

read more

Related Content

How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
View All Content