Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

素質教育:すべての子どもがAである

Daohe · Oct 27, 2024

素質教育の台頭は、教育界の重大な変革であり、公民社会の進歩の重要な指標の一つでもあります。素質教育の理念では、すべての子どもはAであり、これは単に成績を認めることだけではなく、成長過程を全面的に肯定することです。伝統的な教育は、学生の成績を「優良差」や「A、B、C」などの等級で分け、固定された基準に従う階級社会の産物です。素質教育はこの伝統を打ち破り、子どもの学習と成長を多次元的で無限の発展の過程とみなし、個々の差異を尊重し、すべての子どもに平等な地位と機会を与え、能力と素質を伸ばすことを提唱します。 すべての子がA 素質教育の核心理念は、すべての子どもがAであるということであり、つまり、すべての子どもの発展ポテンシャルと機会が平等であるということです。教育は、成績に基づいて子どもに「優劣」のラベルを貼るのではなく、子どもの多元的な潜能と個性の発達に重点を置くべきです。子どもは、学習の過程で、独自のリズムとペースを持ち、進歩はただ成績で測るのではなく、学習への積極的な態度、探求の精神、総合的な成績、多様な分野での成績で認めるべきです。こうしたアプローチは、教育を多元化し、包容的で、すべての子どもが異なる分野、自分の強みを発見できるようにします。 Aの後ろに「+」 素質教育の中では、Aの後ろの「+」は、子どもが学問的進歩を遂げるだけでなく、学習過程で示した追加の努力、積極的な態度、個人的な成長を表します。各々の「+」は、子どもが異なる分野で進歩を遂げたことを示す指標です。たとえば、ある子どもは成績が他の子どもに比べて優秀でないかもしれませんが、芸術、体育、または社会活動で独自の才能を発揮するかもしれません。子どもの「+」の数が多いか少ないかにかかわらず、教育の任務は、子どもに多様な成長環境を提供し、各々の方法で、子どもが自らの「+」の数を積み重ねることを可能にすることです。 無限A+ 素質教育は「無限A+」の理念を提唱し、子どもの学習と成長に、固定された終点はなく、子どもは、自らを挑戦し、より高い成就を追求できるということです。こうした評価システムは、伝統的な成績の制限を打ち破り、学習の持続性と個々の無限の潜能を強調します。無限A+は、子どもの成績を認めるだけでなく、成長過程の信頼と期待を表します。子どもを、学問、スキル、個人的な資質、社会的責任感の面で、卓越を追求するよう励ましています。こうした教育のアプローチは、子どもが将来の挑戦に自信と動機を持ち、多元的な適応能力を身に付けるよう促します。 全員がA 素質教育の価値観では、全ての人がAとみなされます。これは、子どもたちの学習成果を認めるだけでなく、社会的平等の体現でもあります。素質教育は、教育の根本的な目的が子どもたちを優劣に分けることではなく、平等な教育資源と発展の機会を提供し、各々の潜在能力と価値を引き出そうとするものです。子どもたちの天賦や興味の分野が何であれ、教育は、サポートと包容の環境を提供し、各々が得意な分野で成果を上げることができるようにし、同時に新しいことに挑戦し、様々な可能性を探求することを奨励します。「全ての人がA」という理念は、教育におけるラベリング現象を無くし、個体の差異を尊重し、多様性を受け入れることを強調します。 伝統教育と素質教育の比較 伝統的な教育評価システムは固定された基準に基づいて学生をランク付けし、区別する傾向があるが、こうしたアプローチは、子どもが成績が理想的でないと自信を失い、学習の興味を失うことになります。素質教育は多次元的な評価システムで子どもの成長をみることを提唱し、学習の成績に加え、子どもの学習過程での探求の精神、問題解決能力、チームワーク、創造力などの面を重視します。こうした差異化の評価アプローチは、子どもが他人と成績の点数を比較するのではなく、自分の成長の過程に注目するように励むことができます。 多次元の評価方法を通じて、素質教育は子どもに個性化されたサポートを提供し、子どもが得意な分野でより大きな成果を達成することを助力となり、また新しい学習分野を探求し、複雑な問題に適応する能力を培います。こうした方法は子どもに自信を与え、独立した思考力と終身学習の習慣を養います。 素質教育:公民社会への架け橋 素質教育における「全ての人がA」という理念は、教育分野の革新に留まらず、社会的平等を推進する重要な一歩でもあります。普遍的人権という原則に合致し、全ての子どもが教育において平等な機会と発展の権利を享受することを可能にします。この教育方式は、成績のみを追求することをやめ、失敗へのラベリングを打ち破り、社会的階層の分化を減少させ、全ての子どもが教育において公正な待遇と成長の機会を得ることを助けます。 素質教育は、知識とスキルを身に付けた個人のみを育成するのではなく、責任感、社会的配慮、グローバルな視野を備えた将来の公民を育成することを目指してます。このような教育方法を通じて、子どもは幼い頃から正しい公民意識を身に付け、自らと他者の平等な価値を認識し、差異を尊重し、多様性を包容することを学びます。こうした素質は、子どもが将来の社会で様々な役割を果たすのを助け、より公平で、より民主的な公民社会を構築する基礎を築きます。 最後に 素質教育は「どの子どももAである」という理念を提唱し、教育方法の革新と公民の平等を尊重するものです。Aの後ろの「+」は、子どもの無限の成長可能性と継続的な進歩を表し、「無限A+」は、子どもが成長過程で卓越性を追求し、探求することを励ましています。多次元の評価と差異化された育成方法を通じて、素質教育は各々の子どもに平等な発展の機会を提供し、多様な学習環境で自らの価値と潜在能力を示すことを可能にします。こうした教育方法は、より適応力と創造力に富んだ個体を育成するだけでなく、社会をより公平で、より民主的な方向に推進し、公民社会の理想を実現するための堅実な基礎を築きます。

In Quality Education, Every child is an A

Daohe · Oct 27, 2024

The rise of quality education represents a significant transformation in the educational sector and is one of the important markers of progress in civil society. In the philosophy of quality education, every child is seen as an “A”, which not only recognizes their academic achievements but also affirms their entire growth process.  In traditional education, […]

read more

Related Content

Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
View All Content