What is the Social Economy? Explore the Economic System for the Next Era

Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2024
Since humanity entered the capitalist society about five hundred years ago, capitalism has greatly improved human life through the Industrial Revolution and the rapid development afterwards. It has also revealed challenges, including the widening gap between the rich and the poor.

From a historical perspective, our social civilization has evolved from primitive society to slave societies and feudal societies, and then from those to the modern society dominated by capitalism. This evolution indicates that our social civilization is always changing and will continue to change. With all the improvements brought by technology in various aspects of society, our lives are undergoing significant changes. Therefore, as responsible members of society, we need to reflect on what kind of social structure we should choose for the next era.

In this context, I am particularly concerned about the economy, as everyone living in society is part of the economic cycle. The economy of the next era should transcend capitalism, becoming more rational and efficient, allowing each individual to realize their own value.

Through our ongoing research on the economy, we have named the economic system of the next era “social economy.” This system aims to further strengthen the connections between organizations, society, and individuals. While it differs from socialism, it indeed incorporates elements of collectivism.

In a social economy, the form of enterprise is social business. Social businesses are commercial models aimed at addressing social issues such as poverty and environmental challenges.

Dr. Muhammad Yunus, the founder of the Grameen Bank and an economist, proposed the following seven principles for social enterprises:

  1. The primary purpose of a business is not to maximize profits, but to address issues that threaten people and society, such as poverty, education, health, access to information, and environmental concerns.
  2. Achieving financial and economic sustainability.
  3. Investors can only recover their initial investment and will not receive dividends exceeding the principal amount.
  4. Profits generated beyond the investment amount will be used to promote, improve, and expand the social enterprise.
  5. Protecting the environment.
  6. Providing employees with market wages and working conditions that exceed standard requirements.
  7. Engaging joyfully in the work.

 

According to Dr. Yunus’s theory, the primary goal of a social enterprise is to reduce poverty and address social issues, generating sustainable social impact through ongoing business activities.

However, we believe that the concepts of social enterprises are still in their early stages, and they are not sufficient to achieve social reform. Key areas such as how to establish social enterprises, what structures and systems to adopt, and how to achieve sustainable operations and scale expansion require further in-depth research to develop a more comprehensive theoretical framework.

Why is it important to study aspects like organizational structure and systems? To make things work, it is important to combine practice with correct theories. A theory without practice is like a spring without a source, and practice without theory is like a voyage without direction. Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson point out in their book “Why Nations Fail” that institutions are a major factor in a society’s success or failure. A sound economic system can incentivize citizens to invest, promoting capital accumulation and the development of new technologies.

The same applies to enterprises. A well-structured and effective system can unlock employees’ talents, broaden their perspectives, and generate greater value. Moreover, a robust system can support leadership by guiding them in making informed strategic decisions. While individual skills and qualities are undeniably important, a strong system can help bridge gaps in those areas. It not only reduces risks but also fosters talent development, profit growth, and overall business advancement.

Social enterprises are by no means “charitable organizations engaging in trade”. Tthey embody a revolutionary business model that stands at the forefront of our era.

Many companies encounter challenges in developing new products, creating content, or nurturing talent. However, the solutions often reside within the frameworks of social enterprises.

In future articles, I aim to explore how we can address these operational challenges through social enterprises and how we can leverage their principles to drive economic reform.

See you next time!

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

经济繁荣可以依靠政府吗?

Kishou · Jan 22, 2025

当谈到经济调控和减少贫富差距时,很多人会将责任归结到政府身上。政府作为宏观调控的核心主体,确实通过一系列政策和措施在推动经济平衡方面发挥着重要作用。然而,这种依赖是否足够?是否能够真正实现长久的经济繁荣?这一问题值得我们深入探讨。 政府调控的现状与挑战 各国政府长期以来通过税收、财政政策和法律法规来实现经济调控。例如,日本实施的 法人税(Corporate Tax)就是一种直接针对企业盈利能力的税收手段,旨在从富裕的企业中提取资源,再分配给社会中需要支持的领域。类似地,美国也通过 累进所得税 制度,让高收入群体承担更多税负,为社会底层提供更多公共服务。 尽管这些政策在理论上看似完善,但在实际执行中面临诸多挑战: 效率低下与浪费:政府能力的边界 不仅仅是税收分配效率的问题,政府在经济调控中的低效表现也愈发受到关注。 此外,美国在2008年金融危机后推出的大规模量化宽松政策,虽然在短期内稳定了经济,却也被批评为推高了资产价格,加剧了贫富差距。 政府能力的局限性:日本与欧美的案例 历史上,政府经济调控中的局限性屡见不鲜。以日本为例,广场协定的签订导致日元迅速升值,从而触发了经济泡沫的形成与破裂。之后的“失落的三十年”,证明了过度依赖政府调控的局限性。 在欧美国家,类似的问题也并不少见。例如,欧元区在2008年金融危机后的主权债务危机中,一些国家被迫接受严厉的财政紧缩政策。这种政府调控带来的短期稳定,却引发了长期的经济增长乏力,尤其是希腊、西班牙等国的高失业率问题。 经济繁荣需要新的思路 面对政府调控的种种挑战,我们需要重新思考一个问题:经济繁荣是否只能依靠政府?我们一乘公益的答案是 不,政府调控固然重要,但远远不够。 未来的经济繁荣需要政府、企业、个人和社会组织的共同参与。这种多元化的参与机制,意味着以下几点: 以社会为主导的经济调控可能性 如果社会组织和企业逐渐参与到经济调控中,我们可以预见以下可能: 如何实现这样的转变? 当然,这一转变需要长时间的探索与实践。对于没有庞大资本的个人来说,如何避免被巨头资本压制?这一问题的答案,可能在新的金融形式中找到。 社会公民金融 是我们一乘公益提出的未来经济模式之一。在这种模式下,人人都可以通过去中心化的方式参与到经济调控中,并真正享受经济繁荣带来的红利。 如果您对此感兴趣,可以阅读我们关于“社会公民金融”的专题文章,我们将持续展开这一话题,为您展现新时代经济繁荣的可能性。

How capitalism’s financial system intensifies class immobility

Kishou · Jan 20, 2025

Modern finance is rife with inequality. Ordinary individuals are left at an informational and resource disadvantage, increasing their financial risks in investment. In contrast, capitalists exploit insider knowledge and market control to generate massive gains, widening the gap in wealth and solidifying class divides. Urgent reforms are necessary to curb these injustices.

read more

Related Content

The Cost of Extending Pension Contribution Periods
The Cost of Extending Pension Contribution Periods
Avatar photo
Kishou · Feb 1, 2026
Introduction: A Global Surrender of Time Amid a profound global demographic reversal, virtually all modern nations are performing the same quiet yet decisive institutional surgery: delaying retirement ages, extending contribution periods, and recalibrating benefit expectations. Technocrats package this transformation as “the necessary response to the aging crisis,” while fiscal departments frame it as “rational adjustments […]
Mastering the Economy, Shaping the Future
Avatar photo
Kishou · Nov 2, 2024
Civic Economics is an emerging discipline that emphasizes the active participation of citizens in the economic system, pursuing a development model centered on sharing and inclusion. This theory promotes fair wealth distribution and improves social welfare through innovative models such as social enterprises. It also advocates for a sense of global responsibility that transcends national boundaries, fostering sustainable development and civilizational progress.
Can People Rely on the Government to Achieve Economic Prosperity?
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jan 22, 2025
When it comes to economic regulation and reducing the wealth gap, many people tend to place the responsibility on the government. As the central entity of macroeconomic control, the government certainly plays a crucial role in promoting economic balance through a series of policies and measures. However, is this reliance enough? Can it truly lead […]
Why systems matter more than tech
Why systems matter more than tech
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 13, 2025
This passage emphasizes that the key to civilizational progress lies in systems, not technology. A system defines how social resources are organized and how power is structured. Its flexibility determines whether institutions can improve and whether technology can be used effectively—ultimately shaping the direction of civilization. A healthy system drives prosperity; a rigid one leads to collapse. Technology only serves the system.
View All Content