What is the Social Economy? Explore the Economic System for the Next Era

Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2024
Since humanity entered the capitalist society about five hundred years ago, capitalism has greatly improved human life through the Industrial Revolution and the rapid development afterwards. It has also revealed challenges, including the widening gap between the rich and the poor.

From a historical perspective, our social civilization has evolved from primitive society to slave societies and feudal societies, and then from those to the modern society dominated by capitalism. This evolution indicates that our social civilization is always changing and will continue to change. With all the improvements brought by technology in various aspects of society, our lives are undergoing significant changes. Therefore, as responsible members of society, we need to reflect on what kind of social structure we should choose for the next era.

In this context, I am particularly concerned about the economy, as everyone living in society is part of the economic cycle. The economy of the next era should transcend capitalism, becoming more rational and efficient, allowing each individual to realize their own value.

Through our ongoing research on the economy, we have named the economic system of the next era “social economy.” This system aims to further strengthen the connections between organizations, society, and individuals. While it differs from socialism, it indeed incorporates elements of collectivism.

In a social economy, the form of enterprise is social business. Social businesses are commercial models aimed at addressing social issues such as poverty and environmental challenges.

Dr. Muhammad Yunus, the founder of the Grameen Bank and an economist, proposed the following seven principles for social enterprises:

  1. The primary purpose of a business is not to maximize profits, but to address issues that threaten people and society, such as poverty, education, health, access to information, and environmental concerns.
  2. Achieving financial and economic sustainability.
  3. Investors can only recover their initial investment and will not receive dividends exceeding the principal amount.
  4. Profits generated beyond the investment amount will be used to promote, improve, and expand the social enterprise.
  5. Protecting the environment.
  6. Providing employees with market wages and working conditions that exceed standard requirements.
  7. Engaging joyfully in the work.

 

According to Dr. Yunus’s theory, the primary goal of a social enterprise is to reduce poverty and address social issues, generating sustainable social impact through ongoing business activities.

However, we believe that the concepts of social enterprises are still in their early stages, and they are not sufficient to achieve social reform. Key areas such as how to establish social enterprises, what structures and systems to adopt, and how to achieve sustainable operations and scale expansion require further in-depth research to develop a more comprehensive theoretical framework.

Why is it important to study aspects like organizational structure and systems? To make things work, it is important to combine practice with correct theories. A theory without practice is like a spring without a source, and practice without theory is like a voyage without direction. Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson point out in their book “Why Nations Fail” that institutions are a major factor in a society’s success or failure. A sound economic system can incentivize citizens to invest, promoting capital accumulation and the development of new technologies.

The same applies to enterprises. A well-structured and effective system can unlock employees’ talents, broaden their perspectives, and generate greater value. Moreover, a robust system can support leadership by guiding them in making informed strategic decisions. While individual skills and qualities are undeniably important, a strong system can help bridge gaps in those areas. It not only reduces risks but also fosters talent development, profit growth, and overall business advancement.

Social enterprises are by no means “charitable organizations engaging in trade”. Tthey embody a revolutionary business model that stands at the forefront of our era.

Many companies encounter challenges in developing new products, creating content, or nurturing talent. However, the solutions often reside within the frameworks of social enterprises.

In future articles, I aim to explore how we can address these operational challenges through social enterprises and how we can leverage their principles to drive economic reform.

See you next time!

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

幼年谋生之殃:近代东亚儒家社会教育的隐形困局与文明隐患

幼年谋生之殃:近代东亚儒家社会教育的隐形困局与文明隐患

Kishou · Jul 2, 2025

前言:一场文明深处的隐性病灶 表面上,日韩、新加坡等东亚儒家文化圈国家,社会井然、治安良好、教育体制严密,被视作现代文明的东方式典范。然而在这光鲜秩序之下,隐藏着一场长期、系统性的文明性塌陷:幼年谋生型教育体系。 这种现象,源于近代以来东亚各国在现代国家化、工业化进程中,将儒家文化片面功利化、等级化、服从化利用,形成一种将儿童过早推向生存竞争、社会责任、现实功利轨道的教育体制。孩子尚未完成人格发育,即被要求谋生、考核、服从、争位,失去梦想与探索的权利,最终沦为制度化社会的“高效工具人”。 一、东亚儒家社会幼年谋生教育的结构性机制 1. 工业国家化进程中的制度化早期社会化 日本、韩国、新加坡,自19世纪末至20世纪中后叶,相继步入工业化和国家治理现代化。为了培养纪律性劳动力与服从型国民,国家将教育体制变为“顺从规范、适应秩序”的训练场。 幼稚园起,儿童被要求独立生活、整理内务、分担班级责任。小学全面实施集体责任制、等级考核、服从教育。教育目标不在于人格养成,而是“尽早适应社会”。 2. 功利性等级价值观主导 东亚儒家文化圈,长期重视“成败分明”“功名晋升”,近代国家化进程中更将此推至极致。学业排名、行为评比、集体规则量化从小学起贯穿教育全过程,孩子被要求“别麻烦他人”“别拖后腿”“为家庭争光”。 个人梦想、兴趣、创造被视为不务正业,价值观高度功利化,谋生能力成为唯一社会通行证。 3. 家庭、学校、社会三方共谋机制 传统儒家文化中的家族责任观与近现代国家治理目标相互叠加,形成家庭—学校—社会三重压力体系。 家长将子女视作家庭未来保障与荣耀载体,教育即“家庭投资”。学校成为选拔与驯化场,社会则是竞争考场。幼年便灌输“进名校”“进大企”“稳定收入”理念,精神成长空间被彻底压缩,教育沦为生存竞争机器。 二、个体层面的深层危害 1.梦想能力与人格自由被剥夺 幼年本应是幻想、好奇、探索、试错的人格发育阶段,东亚幼年谋生教育却强制孩子学会利益计算、欲望压抑、风险规避,扼杀“做梦”的能力。 成年后普遍精神麻木、价值虚无,丧失自我探索与人生追问动力。 2. 情感压抑与内耗人格 “别麻烦他人”“集体优先”“为家族争光”的教育文化,长期抹杀真实情感表达,导致东亚社会青少年普遍不敢表达悲伤、愤怒、恐惧。成年后陷入强迫性工作狂、社交恐惧、自闭症倾向、社畜文化与孤独死问题。 日韩、新加坡均长期处于发达国家青少年自杀率前列。 3. 自我价值感低落 过度依赖他人评价,缺乏内在价值认同,成年后习惯以公司、家庭、社会认同为人生坐标,极易崩溃、自我否定,形成精神空壳化。 三、社会结构层面的文明隐患 1.大规模“工具人化” 批量制造“谋生之孩”,成年后执行力强、创新力弱、价值趋同,成为制度化社会“有效工具”。社会缺少文明进化所需的颠覆性创新与精神活力。 日本“社畜文化”、韩国“过劳死经济”、新加坡“绩优社畜现象”正是典型表现。 2. 精神文明衰退与文化空洞化 东亚社会长期实用功利化教育导致文化创新力下降,年轻人沉溺宅文化、虚拟偶像、手游经济、低欲望生活,“文明空洞”现象日益严重。 日韩近30年经济停滞、文化软实力衰退、新加坡青年抑郁率上升,均源自幼年谋生教育对精神文明活力的蚕食。 四、文明演化视角下的结构性危机 完整公民制度的信仰体系,灵魂信仰保障内在尊严,文明信仰保障外在秩序。两者文明进步依赖有梦想、有创造、有反叛精神的人群,而非单纯执行者。 儒家文化型社会若继续将儿童过早异化为谋生机器,虽表面稳定秩序井然,实则失去文明进化动能。 近30年日韩经济创新力衰退、文化对外影响力式微,正源于此。文明若无“做梦者”,必然走向稳定化→保守化→僵化→退化之路。 五、文明型社会对比 北欧国家(瑞典、芬兰、挪威)教育体系,坚持: 这些国家创新力、幸福指数、青少年心理健康、社会信任度远超东亚儒家文化圈,成为现代文明型社会典范。 六、结语:东亚儒家文化圈社会的文明自救 孩子不该只学谋生。真正的教育,应守护基本生存技能之外,更重要的是保留梦想、质疑、探索、反叛、突破的生命本能。儒家文化型社会若想摆脱文明停滞、创新衰退、精神危机,必须: 否则,继续制造“谋生之孩”,东亚文明将陷入温水慢煮式衰败,终成稳定、无梦、无文化生命力的文明遗骸。 七、附名词解释: 幼年谋生教育(Early Livelihood-oriented Education) 指的是一种将成年社会生存法则、责任体系与功利性价值观,提前强加给学龄前至青少年儿童的教育模式。其核心特征是: 将孩子视为未来劳动力与社会秩序执行者,而非独立人格和梦想实践者,使其过早学会现实妥协、社会谋生、规则服从,而忽视人格养成、情感自由、梦想激发与批判性精神培养。 这一教育方式通常表现为: 核心目的: 通过教育早期社会化、集体规范化、工具技能化,制造稳定、服从、高效、善于谋生的社会工具人群体,为成年社会体系持续输送“稳定零件”。

The Two Beliefs of a Complete Citizen

The Two Beliefs of a Complete Citizen

Master Wonder · Jun 20, 2025

Introduction Since the birth of life, faith has always played an essential role in it. Throughout every stage of human society, faith has never been absent. From primitive totems and religious worship to modern national narratives and the belief in technological supremacy, faith has been a driving force that sustains collective identity, shapes personal values, […]

read more

Related Content

How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs “Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems”
How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs “Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems”
Avatar photo
Kishou · Feb 5, 2026
Preface: Employment is Not Just a “Livelihood,” but a Basic License for Civic Existence In capitalist ideology, “employment” is brutally reduced to a purely instrumental equation: “Job → Income → Survival.” This logic chains human existence to capital’s hiring whims, systematically equating joblessness with social worthlessness. Unemployment becomes morally weaponized—branded as proof of personal inadequacy, market […]
Can People Rely on the Government to Achieve Economic Prosperity?
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jan 22, 2025
When it comes to economic regulation and reducing the wealth gap, many people tend to place the responsibility on the government. As the central entity of macroeconomic control, the government certainly plays a crucial role in promoting economic balance through a series of policies and measures. However, is this reliance enough? Can it truly lead […]
Why systems matter more than tech
Why systems matter more than tech
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 13, 2025
This passage emphasizes that the key to civilizational progress lies in systems, not technology. A system defines how social resources are organized and how power is structured. Its flexibility determines whether institutions can improve and whether technology can be used effectively—ultimately shaping the direction of civilization. A healthy system drives prosperity; a rigid one leads to collapse. Technology only serves the system.
The Cost of Extending Pension Contribution Periods
The Cost of Extending Pension Contribution Periods
Avatar photo
Kishou · Feb 1, 2026
Introduction: A Global Surrender of Time Amid a profound global demographic reversal, virtually all modern nations are performing the same quiet yet decisive institutional surgery: delaying retirement ages, extending contribution periods, and recalibrating benefit expectations. Technocrats package this transformation as “the necessary response to the aging crisis,” while fiscal departments frame it as “rational adjustments […]
View All Content