Unhappiness Stems From Exclusive Civilization Systems

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 28, 2024
The design of a civilization system is closely tied to the values within society. For the current human civilization, the key to progress lies in offering equal love and care for all. 

Happiness is a universal goal and a driving force for creation. Yet, in a world shaped by complex systems and rapid technological change, many of us often feel isolated, anxious, and powerless. This is not due to personal failure. Instead, it results from a societal system that opens doors for some while closing them for others.

The design of a civilization system is closely tied to the values within society. For the current human civilization, the key to progress lies in offering equal love and care for all. 

Yicheng Commonweal is actively working to ensure that everyone experiences both a sense of existence and participation, while enjoying the happiness and fulfillment of a civilized society.

I. The Root Causes of Exclusion in the Civilization System

1. The Alienation of Standardized Rules

Current civilization systems often rely on explicit or covert rules to maintain order. These rules may increase efficiency in the short term, but they tend to suppress diversity and individuality. Rigid rules often force people to adapt to the system, changing who they are in the process. Those who can’t meet the standards are often left out of the pursuit of happiness.

For example, many education systems still use standardized exams to measure students’ abilities. They overlook values like emotion and creativity, which can’t be quantified. The system sacrificed the potential of many kids and caused the overall creativity of future society to decline dramatically.

2. Unequal Distribution of Resources

In many societies, resource distribution is claimed to be “fair.” But in reality, the system frequently favors those who are already in a stronger position. While policies might talk about fairness, they often fail to address deeper, structural issues like the historical inequalities faced by certain groups. Simply providing equal resources doesn’t solve the problem if no targeted interventions are made.

Take the widening wealth gap, for example. Or how top-tier education and healthcare are concentrated in certain areas. These issues have put many people at a disadvantage in the race for success. People marginalized by the system gradually lose their chance to pursue happiness. Struggling to meet basic needs, they are unable to nurture a sense of well-being.

Despite living on the same planet, people in different countries and regions experience vast disparities in living standards. People in developed countries can easily access benefits that others in underdeveloped areas have to work hard for. 

This disparity stems from differences in societal civilization systems. Resources tend to concentrate in more advanced systems, creating a significant injustice for those in less developed regions. Without systemic intervention or self-help efforts, this inequality will be difficult to resolve.

3. The Alienation of Technological Progress

Technology has made our civilization systems more efficient, but it has also created new forms of isolation. Take artificial intelligence and automation, for example. While they have increased productivity, they are going to replace many traditional jobs. As a result, many workers feel a loss of value and a fear of losing their jobs.

At the same time, social media and digital technologies, while connecting people from around the world, often make us feel lost in opinions and attacks from various sides. In this digital age, it is harder to form real emotional connections, and this erodes our sense of happiness.

4. The Suppression of Cultural Diversity

In modern societies, dominant cultures shape the civilization system, often overlooking the needs of diverse cultures. Groups that don’t align with mainstream values or lifestyles face marginalization and, in some cases, discrimination. Immigrants, ethnic minorities, and gender minorities often find themselves labeled as outsiders. Their sense of identity and happiness is continually suppressed.

II. The Far-reaching Impact of Exclusion on Happiness

1. A Crisis in Mental Health

People who are excluded often experience feelings of loneliness and helplessness, which can lead to a mental health crisis. The widespread rise in depression and anxiety is partly due to the civilization system’s failure to address individual psychological needs. 

When individuals are forced to fit into a system that doesn’t admit their values as a person, their mental resilience weakens. This decline in well-being can result in burnout, social anxiety, autism, and even conditions like agoraphobia or manic depression.

2. Indifferent Interpersonal Relationships

In today’s fast-paced world, the drive for efficiency often comes at the cost of real human connections. With everyone relying more on digital communication, there’s little time left for face-to-face interactions that truly build relationships. 

As a result, emotional connections become rarer, and our sense of happiness starts to weaken. People become more guarded in their social interactions, and the overall atmosphere feels colder. In fact, “Don’t bother others” has become the unspoken rule of the day.

3. A Loss of Sense

Happiness is not just about material wealth—it also needs a deeper sense of meaning. However, current value systems focus more on external markers of success, like wealth and status, while neglecting the nurturing and appreciation of inner values. Many civilization systems are built on this collective value system.

As a result, those who feel excluded from this system lose their sense of control over life. They struggle to find personal meaning, drifting into a “vacuum” of happiness—lost, confused, and uncertain of where to turn next.

II. Breaking the Cycle of Exclusion: The Path to True Happiness

1. People-oriented Institutional Reform

Civilization systems need to shift from an “efficiency-first” approach to a “people-oriented” one. For example, education systems should focus more on personalized development, honoring each child’s unique talents. Healthcare systems should aim for universal coverage, easing the health anxieties of vulnerable groups. True happiness can only be achieved when institutional designs meet the basic needs of every individual.

2. Creating an Inclusive Culture

Civilization systems need to embrace diverse cultural expressions and respect different lifestyles. Through legislation and social advocacy, we can reduce discrimination and prejudice against vulnerable groups. Cultural events and community building can foster greater understanding and empathy between groups, allowing everyone to feel the warmth of acceptance.

3. Reshaping the People-Technology Connection

The role of technological progress should be to foster human well-being, not deepen exclusion. For example, as digital technologies are introduced, we need to ensure they are accessible to the elderly and low-income groups. 

Similarly, in the case of artificial intelligence, it’s crucial to implement policies that protect workers’ rights and create pathways for reemployment for those whose jobs are lost. Otherwise, the wealth gap will continue to grow and aggravate inequality.

4. Redefining Happiness and Success

Happiness shouldn’t be defined by wealth, status, or material success. True fulfillment comes from pursuing personal values beyond external achievements. In a world where burnout and mental health struggles are common, society needs to shift focus from external success to internal well-being.

Through education and media, we can help people see that happiness is about meaningful connections, a sense of community, and harmony with nature. The diverse definitions of happiness in society can reduce external stress and peer pressure, allowing them to embrace a wider range of lifestyles and cultures.

III. Conclusion

The unhappiness many people feel comes from being excluded by the civilization systems. To address the problem, it is necessary to reconsider the underlying values and design of these systems in our society. Instead of rigid rules, we need to prioritize inclusivity. Happiness is not an unattainable goal, but a right for everyone.

When the value of collective well-being is advocated and practiced in the systems, people will find a sense of belonging and meaning. Only then can we experience true joy and embrace endless progress in our society.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

政府が少数者のために奉仕するときの二つの顕著な特徴

政府が少数者のために奉仕するときの二つの顕著な特徴

Daohe · Jul 29, 2025

市民意識の覚醒による制度進化、文明的思考による国家の再構築   序論:政府は誰のために奉仕するのか。それは技術的な問題ではなく、文明の立場を問う問題である。 どの世代も、一つの根本的な問いに直面します:国家という構造は、一体誰を代表しているのか? それは人民か、それともごく少数の特権階級か? もし政府が少数者に奉仕する道具へと成り下がったなら、その社会の統治ロジックは根本から歪みます。つまり、人民はもはや統治の「主体」ではなく、管理され、搾取され、操作される「資源」と化すのです この歪みが一度制度化されると、二つの特徴が現れます。これは全国民が強く警戒すべきものです。   特徴1:人民は雑に扱われ、権力による抑圧が常態化する 1. 「公共の権力」から「利益収奪マシン」への変質 本来、国民に奉仕すべき公共の権力が、ひとたび少数者に掌握されると、真っ先に起こる変化は――国民が「主人」から搾取される「資源」へと転落し、平等な尊厳を失い、繰り返し奪われるだけの利用価値しか持たなくなることです。 増税しても民生は改善されない:一部の国や地域では、庶民は重税に苦しんでいるにもかかわらず、医療、教育、住宅といった公共サービスは絶えず縮小され、「税金は払えるが、病気の治療も、子供の教育も、家の確保もままならない」という普遍的な苦境に陥っています。 資源配分が著しく偏る:政策は権力者や富裕層に傾き、住宅、土地、融資、公職といった重要な資源は高度に集中します。一般人は「対価を支払う者」ではあっても、決して「機会を得る者」にはなれません。 2. 権力は「強きを助け、弱きを挫く」。暴力的な統治の常態化 補償なき強制立ち退き、法的保障なき陳情者の拘束:一部の土地政策の執行において、強制立ち退きが頻発し、個人の抗議者は不法に拘束され、時には「行方不明」にさえなります。その一方で、「青信号」が出されるのは、決まって財閥のプロジェクトです。 庶民の声は汚名を着せられ、黙殺される:改善策を提案した一般市民は、しばしば「騒ぎを起こす者」というレッテルを貼られ、建設的な意見は抑圧されます。その結果、政策は自己修正のメカニズムを失っていきます。 3. 国民の尊厳が構造的に解体される このような統治ロジックの下で、「公民」は次第に「従順な民」へと退化し、人々は「自分は無力な存在だ」というアイデンティティを受け入れ始めます。そして社会全体に、無関心、無力感、そしてシニシズムが蔓延するのです。 政治制度がもはや国民の参加意識を喚起できなくなった時、腐敗と不正は例外的な事件ではなく、安定した日常となります。   特徴2:民生政策は反故にされ、制度自体が「国民の幸福」を嫌悪する 1. 民生政策は「選択肢」ではなく、「厄介なお荷物」となる 政府が少数者の利益に奉仕するなら、少数者の私益に反する政策はすべて、たとえ人民の幸福にどれほど有益であっても、軽んじられ、無視され、あるいは中止されます。 公教育、基礎医療、基礎的住居が「足手まとい」の代名詞に:例えば、一部の都市では不動産開発や企業誘致を優先する過程で、末端の教育や医療への投資が繰り返し削減され、農村の子供たちが「上を目指す道」を失っています。 政策立案者が現場を知らない:特権階級で生活する官僚は、庶民のニーズを理解しておらず、真に実行可能で地に足のついた政策を策定できません。彼らが民生を語るのは、単なる「言葉のレパートリーの更新」の一環に過ぎません。 2. 提案は「面倒事」と見なされ、提案者は「問題製造者」として扱われる 不採用、偽りの採用、恣意的な解釈:多くの民衆からの提案は合理的であるにもかかわらず、「非公式ルート」から来たという理由で無視され、甚だしきは改ざんされます。最終的には「形式主義」のパフォーマンスの小道具と化します。 市民参加が制度的に圧縮される:民間組織、世論による監視、議会制度は行政の独占に阻まれ、真の民生を反映する制度的なルートを欠きます。その結果、「目に見えるプロジェクト」ばかりが行われ、「真に改善をもたらす仕事」は行われなくなります。 3. 形式主義と空虚な言葉がまかり通る 政策语言越来越“漂亮”,实际操作越来越“残酷”。 “共建共享”、“为人民谋幸福”这类口号频繁出现,但落实上变成: 高齢者はDX化に戸惑う。 末端の幹部に「深夜まで書類仕事をさせる」。 弱者層を永遠に制度の抜け穴に閉じ込める。   なぜ彼らは人民の提案に耳を傾けないのか? 多くの人々は今なお、「いつかは良心に目覚めるだろう」という期待を抱いています。 しかし現実は、彼らは聞きたくないのではなく、聞く動機がなく、聞かなくても何のコストもかからないのです。 【一乗公益からの特注】:真の変革は、感傷を乗り越えた先見性と、断固たる行動から生まれます。 私たちは、機能不全に陥った制度や、正統性を失った権力に対し、沈黙や妥協ではなく、賢明な変革を追求することを呼びかけます。 世界の複雑さを前に、無垢な善意だけに頼る時代は終わりました。構造そのものを見抜く「文明の知性」をもって、未来への道を切り拓く時です。   1. 「民意を聞く」こと自体が、彼らの利益ロジックに合致しない 特権階級に奉仕する統治システムにとって、「人民の意見を聞く」ことは義務ではなく、脅威です。なぜなら、一度資源構造を改革し、特権の構図を打ち破れば、長らく利益を得てきた少数派グループは損失を被るからです。 2. 「人民」は制度設計の主語ではなく、操作可能な客体に過ぎない 人民は動員され、宣伝され、収穫され、犠牲にされることはあっても、 自主的な表現権、制度における発言権、資源の采配権を持つことは極めて難しい。 多くの権力者の視点では、人民は「主体」ではなく、「変数」なのです。 […]

警惕:政府为少数人服务的两个鲜明特征

警惕:政府为少数人服务的两个鲜明特征

Daohe · Jul 29, 2025

以公民觉醒推进制度进化,以文明思维重构国家方向 引言:政府为谁服务,不是技术问题,而是文明立场问题 每一代人都会面临一个根本性的问题:国家机器究竟代表谁? 是广大人民,还是极少数的特权者? 如果一个政府沦为少数人服务的工具,那么这个社会的治理逻辑就会发生根本性异化:人民不再是治理的对象,而是被管理、被压榨、被操控的资源。 这种异化一旦制度化,便会显现出两个极其鲜明的特征,值得全民高度警惕。 特征一:人民被视为草芥,权力以压迫为常态 1. 从“公共权力”蜕变为“利益机器” 本应服务人民的公共权力,一旦被少数人控制,最先发生的改变是——人民从“主人”变成“矿藏”,不再享有平等的尊严,而只剩被反复掠夺的利用价值。 2. 权力“护贵压贱”,暴力治理常态化 3. 人民的尊严感遭到结构性瓦解 在这种治理逻辑下,“公民”逐渐退化为“顺民”,人们开始接受“我就是无权者”的身份,而整个社会弥漫着冷漠、无力和犬儒主义。 一旦政治制度无法再激发人民参与感,腐败和不公就会稳定存在,而不是例外事件。 特征二:民生政策如厕纸,制度本身嫌弃“人民幸福” 1. 民生措施不是“可选项”,而是“被嫌弃的负担” 政府若服务于少数人利益,那么一切不利于少数人私利的政策,哪怕对人民福祉再有益,也会被贬低、忽视甚至中止: 2. 建议被视为“麻烦”,建言者被当成“问题制造者” 3. 形式主义与空话套话大行其道 为何他们不会听进人民的建议? 许多人仍然抱有一种天真的期待:“他们总会良心发现吧?” 但现实往往是:不是他们不愿听,而是没有动力听,更没有成本不听。 在这里一乘公益特别提示:不要浪费你的生命与智慧,与一群垃圾为伍。 该罢免就罢免,该反抗就反抗,该让他们扫地出门就出门,这是垃圾的唯一标准场地。到了垃圾场再分类,事先不要分类。 提前分类往往会受到情感支配,如“人之初,性本善”思维幻觉的影响。 1. “听民意”本身不符合其利益逻辑 对一个为特权者服务的治理体系来说,“听从人民意见”不是义务,而是威胁。因为一旦改革资源结构、打破特权格局,那些长期受益的少数集团将遭受利益损失。 2. “人民”不是制度设计的主语,而是可被操纵的对象 3. 所以他们也想不出真正可行的民生政策 这不是个人素质的问题,而是结构性冷漠。当一个政治系统长期脱离真实生活,不以人民福祉为反馈标准,便会形成“无能治理”: 历史镜鉴与现实映照:一切制度的兴衰都源于“为谁服务” 回顾人类历史,许多大国并非亡于外敌,而是亡于“制度内部腐朽”。 结语:制度的价值,不在于它说了什么,而在于它真正保护了谁 我们不能仅仅看制度有没有说“人民”,有没有讲“民生”,更要看它在运作层面,是否真正体现人民的权力,保障人民的尊严,改善人民的生活。 如果我们对“政府为谁服务”的根本问题保持沉默,那所有的改革都将成为掩盖问题的形式主义,而所有的未来,都可能继续重复悲剧。 一个真正的现代文明政府,不应该是为少数人设立的高塔,而应是为全民铺设的桥梁。   Photo By Galería de fotografías del Ministerio de Defensa

read more

Related Content

Love Never Fades— We are the Ones Who Drift Away
Avatar photo
Kishou · Nov 6, 2024
Though love is considered part of human nature, many people question or deny its existence because of past traumas or an absence of love in their lives. However, the real problem lies in their inner disconnection from love. Rebuilding trust in love and cultivating self-love are crucial to overcoming loneliness and rediscovering the warmth and truth of love.
Life’s Three Levels and Three Mindsets
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
  On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has […]
Growth Mindset: Why It Matters and How to Develop It
Growth Mindset: Why It Matters and How to Develop It
Avatar photo
Daohe · Mar 25, 2025
Two Roads for One Pair of Legs: Choosing Between Fixed and Growth Mindsets The way people perceive the world shapes their growth and life path, especially when they encounter difficulties, failures, and challenges. Different mindsets lead to distinct outcomes. No matter where you start or how talented you are, having a growth mindset keeps you […]
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
The phenomenon of thinking regression: A deep analysis from the perspective of cognitive logic and the resetting of habits. I. What is Regressive Thinking? Regressive Thinking is not merely backwardness but refers to a phenomenon where individuals or groups, because of their inability to adapt to the demands of deep thinking in a complex cognitive […]
View All Content