What Is Civilization, the Mysterious Concept that is So Hard to Grasp?

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 7, 2024
This article comes from a volunteer meeting where Daohe shared her insight on the concept of “civilization”. As a member of the volunteer group, I took notes during the discussion and wrote this article later. Please excuse any incomplete or missing details in the article. Introduction Recently, while explaining the vision and mission of Yicheng […]

This article comes from a volunteer meeting where Daohe shared her insight on the concept of “civilization”. As a member of the volunteer group, I took notes during the discussion and wrote this article later. Please excuse any incomplete or missing details in the article.

Introduction

Recently, while explaining the vision and mission of Yicheng Commonweal to others, I noticed something quite strange. Many people lack the understanding of civilization, or they are confused about the concept. So what exactly is civilization? Why is it so abstract and so hard to understand?

When people lack a proper perspective on civilization, it becomes difficult to see the direction of society. This article discusses the concept of civilization and why Yicheng Commonweal was established to promote the advancement of civilization.

I. The Definition of Civilization

Civilization is the sum of the physical and spiritual achievements that human societies accumulate over time. It includes the formation and evolution of political and economic systems, social institutions and laws, culture, and value systems. Civilization is like a house that guarantees the people living inside. The structure, size, and quality of the civilization house—shaped by governance, education, culture, and social welfare—directly influence people’s living conditions and mental state. In essence, the average quality of life and collective well-being in a society depend on its civilization.

Like houses, civilizations vary greatly in quality. Some are like shabby shacks, unable to provide basics for its residents. In contrast, some are like luxurious villas, offering comfort and security. The pursuit of a better life is at the heart of the constant advancement of civilization, which is the driving force behind the continuous advancement of social civilization.

The question is, how do we evaluate the level of civilization in society? The more civilized a society is, the better its systems and institutions support the growth and well-being of its people. A highly civilized society fosters the values and practices of goodness, morality, love, and dignity, encouraging flourishing development across all aspects. In contrast, societies with lower levels of civilization often trample on these values, promote toxic ideologies, and undermine people’s well-being, creating a vicious cycle of decline. 

In a more civilized society, individuals receive greater social support, requiring less effort to achieve success and happiness in life. Instead, in less developed societies, individuals face significant barriers to personal growth and prosperity, often requiring an extraordinary amount of effort—sometimes hundreds or thousands of times more — just to attain what others may take for granted. In these societies, people usually suffer from all sorts of great hardship. 

Once you comprehend what civilization truly means, it becomes clear how societies differ in their levels of civilization. Even now, the disparity in civilization levels between nations and districts is clear, directly corresponding to differences in overall well-being. This can be clearly seen in migration trends. While people may not always have a clear understanding of civilization, the pursuit of well-being is universal, motivating many to move to more developed societies.

II. Civilization Needs to Be Maintained and Upgraded

Without a proper perspective and scale of understanding civilization, it is difficult for people to comprehend the flow of human history and the future direction of civilization, which may result in a few common misconceptions. 

1. The Optimistic View: Observing the economic and scientific achievements of human societies in the past, some people become blindly optimistic, so they believe as society “naturally” develops, human society will keep developing itself.

2. The Pessimistic View: After witnessing the decline and collapse of civilizations throughout history and all sorts of man-made disasters, some conclude that human nature is inherently evil and that human actions are essentially pointless. Seeing this historical pattern, they predict that civilization will inevitably fall again.

3. The Apathy View: Unable to see clearly, some choose to shut their eyes and avoid contemplating these issues. They believe that individual lives have no connection to societal development and that individual success depends solely on personal efforts. Alternatively, they may lack vision for the future and content themselves with living in the present.

In reality, all three of these mindsets are problematic and can lead to  poor life decisions. The development of civilization is not a natural or automatic process. Instead, it is shaped by the choices of individuals within society. History is merely the result and feedback of those choices and actions. The progress of civilization depends on people who are thoughtful, engaged, and dedicated to addressing societal issues. Without their efforts and critical thinking, society will face difficulties in progressing.

When the overwhelming majority of people decide to tolerate and enable evil, rather than pushing for the advancement of goodness, the forces of corruption will rise, causing society to deteriorate. In contrast, when people choose good and virtue, resisting evil and injustice, society will move forward in a positive direction, creating benefits and hope for its people.

Inaction is, in itself, a decision. If people are dissatisfied with their circumstances but choose not to make changes — simply conforming to the status quo — they allow evil to spread and invite man-made disasters. If civilization does not progress toward a better direction, it will stagnate or even regress. As British historian Arnold Toynbee said, Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.

As a result, it is crucial for individuals to actively maintain and advance the various systems and institutions within society, including the economy, politics, education, law, culture, and welfare systems. This kind of social practice is what will steadily elevate people’s living standards, bringing sustained happiness and hope, and enabling the “house” of civilization to grow and upgrade.

III. The Different Stages of Human Civilization

Throughout history, human society has progressed through various stages of civilization, each marked by distinct characteristics and systems. These stages can broadly be divided into three major categories: the Slave Society, the Feudal Society, the Capitalist Society.  In the future, we will soon witness the emergence of the Social Citizen Society.

1. The Slave Society: The system is based on the complete dehumanization of one group for the benefit of another. The fundamental belief in this society is that some people are meant to serve others, and the slaves themselves internalize this belief, seeing themselves as inherently subordinate.

2. The Feudal Society: This system was built upon coercion, deception, and the consolidation of power by a select few. People were expected to focus solely on their own lives and the well-being of their families, showing little interest in the larger social or political changes occurring around them.

3. The Capitalist Society: This system is based on business employment, commercial transactions, labor exploitation, and financial manipulation, where power is concentrated in the hands of capitalists and financiers. People are at risk of being exploited by capital interests and deceived by financial institutions. The values of freedom, equality, democracy are widely recognized and people participate in politics mainly to protect their personal interests as well as secure their rights.

4. The Social Citizen Society: It is based on a capitalist financial system that operates on principles of cooperation, mutual benefit, co-creation, and shared prosperity. Compared with the current capitalist system, it mainly serves the interests of social citizens instead of capitalists. The ideals of freedom, democracy, equality, and creativity resonate deeply, empowering people to become the leaders and catalysts of social progress.

The differences between these stages of civilization have led to significant disparities in the quality of life and cultural values around the world. While some societies on Earth are heading towards social citizen society, some are still struggling in the model of feudal society, leading to great gap in quality of life and cultural values among different regions. It is a heartbreaking fact, and the reason why we are so committed to civilization education.

IV. Faith is the Soul of Civilization

Faith remains a constant force in human civilization, like the sun in the sky—unaffected by progress or decline. Faith is the driving force behind humanity’s pursuit of goodness and virtue. It is the deep, inherent choice within the soul of every individual. Without the support and guidance of faith, acts of kindness and goodness are hard to sustain. In societies where civilization is underdeveloped, faith serves as the only form of salvation, providing the motivation for people to act and the spiritual strength to guide societal transformation.

Faith is not limited to religions. It encompasses any value system that promotes goodness and virtue. Some may not believe in any religion but instead hold firm to ideals such as freedom, equality, democracy, and justice. These beliefs guide individuals toward societal progress. This is why Yicheng Commonweal focuses on enhancing and developing faith—recognizing all beliefs that inspire positive change.

V. Education Shapes the Future of Civilization

Education is the key to nurturing the next generation of leaders. The security and well-being of society in the future will depend on the systems we build today, as well as the quality of the education we provide. This obvious truth is often overlooked, yet it is the key to long-term social stability and progress. Education equips individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to lead and innovate, and these leaders are the ones who will shape the future direction of society.

Outdated education systems produce individuals who are ill-prepared to meet the demands of an ever-evolving world. When education fails to adapt to new challenges and emerging needs, it creates a gap between what society requires and the talents it produces. This disconnect leads to stagnation, where social development lacks momentum and the potential for future progress diminishes. 

On the other hand, by nurturing individuals who are equipped with the right skills, values, and critical thinking abilities, education fosters innovation, creativity, and leadership, enabling society to evolve and thrive.

Daohe also shared her insight on some of the myths people have about civilization.

1. The level of civilization in society is determined by its economic progress.

Economic development is a necessary condition for the progress of civilization and a reflection of that progress, but it is not a sufficient condition. A more advanced civilization tends to nurture greater intellectual freedom and creativity, encouraging people to work together, share, and support one another, which drives further economic progress.

However, as mentioned earlier, civilization encompasses various systems and institutions within a society. While the economic system is a key aspect, it is just one part of the broader system. Political structures, cultural norms, and other systems—both tangible and intangible—also impact the progression of civilization and shape a society’s development. Even in a society with a strong economy, if other systems fall behind, it weakens the ability to handle risks and undermines the potential for long-term progress.

A historical example can be found in the Punic Wars, fought between the Roman and Carthaginian Empires in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE. Despite Carthage’s commercial prosperity and naval power, it was defeated by Rome, which had less economic and military strength. What factors contributed to Carthage’s defeat?

The reason behind Rome’s triumph lies in the fact that, except for its naval and economic strength, it was far more advanced than Carthage in key areas such as politics, law, and diplomacy. Moreover, Roman society was bound together by a strong sense of patriotism, where the preservation of the state was the ultimate value. This cultural cohesion gave them the strength to endure hardships and continue fighting, even when facing significant losses.

On the other hand, Carthage was prosperous—its wealth was precisely what made it a target for Roman expansion. However, rather than relying on a dedicated citizen army, Carthage hired foreign mercenaries, as its people were more concerned with commercial gain than defending their nation. As a result, the mercenaries lacked loyalty, and some even betrayed Carthage during their defeats by switching allegiance to Rome. Even the military genius of Hannibal failed to save Carthage, as the government failed to give him the support he needed, which contributed to the eventual collapse of the empire.

This makes it clear that while economic development offers significant benefits to society, it must be supported by other systems. Without this, economic progress may become a destructive temptation for others. Even without external pressures, a society that neglects cultural and intellectual growth can become lost in confusion and disillusionment, paving the way for corruption to flourish.

2. Civilization is the moral level of a society. In primitive tribes, the system was generally communal, with no appearance or division of social classes, making primitive tribes more “civilized”.

Firstly, during the time of primitive tribes, human societies were small in scale and characterized by low productivity. Advanced systems of labor division and collaboration had yet to develop. Living relied on direct sharing of resources and basic production methods, not on the complex organization seen in technologically, culturally, and economically advanced societies. Therefore, discussing the “level of civilization” at this point in history is irrelevant.

Secondly, the lifestyle and relationships among members of the tribe were more shaped by the need to survive than by any high moral standards. To survive, they adopted the most practical approach to resource sharing given their circumstances.

Directly associating the resource allocation systems of primitive tribes with moral standards or the level of civilization is a misinterpretation and oversimplification of the concept of “civilization.” Civilization’s true essence lies in how efficiently a society organizes and manages itself to enhance the well-being of all its members while safeguarding individual interests.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

公務員の「制度の駒」としての人生:グローバルな制度進化における犠牲者の論理

公務員の「制度の駒」としての人生:グローバルな制度進化における犠牲者の論理

Daohe · Aug 30, 2025

――歴史、文明、制度を横断する、制度的統制の罠―― 序論:世界的な悲劇、制度的な設定 現代の多くの国々において、それが民主国家であれ、権威主義体制であれ、あるいは新興の政体であれ、「公務員」という集団の役割は、危険かつ逆説的な構造の中に囚われています。 忠誠を求められながら、清廉潔白でいられる余地を与えられない。 権力を与えられながら、その人格の尊厳は保障されない。 秩序を維持するよう求められながら、いつでも身代わりの羊(スケープゴート)にされうる。 このような「制度の駒として使われる人生」は、東洋特有のものでも、権威主義体制の専売特許でもありません。これは、世界の制度文明が長期にわたって進化してきた副産物であり、行政官僚システムそのものに固有の、犠牲を生み出すメカニズムなのです。そして、それは世界的な普遍性と、制度としての継承性を持っています。 一、古代帝国から植民地体制へ:公務員の「犠牲となる」性質の世界的起源 1. 古代ローマとペルシャ帝国:忠実な道具 vs. 権力による収穫 古代ローマ帝国は、世界で最も初期の巨大な文官システムの一つを確立しました。しかし、このシステムの核心的な論理は、「実行者に権限はなく、責任は全て負わされる」というものでした。地方総督が治安維持、徴税、軍糧供給をできなければ、元老院に弾劾され、職務怠慢で追放され、時には街頭で処刑される可能性さえありました。 ペルシャ帝国も同様で、その「帝国の目」と呼ばれた監察官は、高い地位にありながら、皇帝の「耳目」であると同時に「生贄」でもありました。一度でも忠誠心に疑いを持たれれば、まず処刑され、その後に責任が問われる、という具合でした。 2. 中世の教会権力と王権のシステム:官僚が置かれた高圧的な苦境 中世西ヨーロッパの王権と教会権力が並立していた時代、王室の書記官や教皇庁の助祭長は、最高位の公務員でありながら、最も高いリスクを背負う者たちでもありました。主君のために働いた多くの高級行政官が、権力闘争、責任転嫁、そして世論による断罪の中で命を落としました。 イングランドのトマス・ベケットのように、忠臣でありながら、最終的には「政治的な死体」となる例は少なくありません。 3. 植民地システム:派遣された官僚が陥る二重の牢獄 イギリス、フランス、オランダ、スペインといった植民地帝国は、世界中に多くの植民地行政官を派遣しました。彼らは「現地住民を平定し、税を搾り取る」一方で、本国の議会や現地の資本家の機嫌を損ねるわけにはいきませんでした。彼らは、植民地での危機、反乱の失敗、経済の衰退といった事態において、しばしば「最初の犠牲者」となったのです。 世界の植民地史における「不運な総督たち」の記録は、制度が人材をいかに「燃料」として消費してきたかを、最も如実に物語っています。 二、近代国家の「行政機械」:権力の中で人格を奪われる人々 1. ナチス・ドイツとソビエト体制:制度の消耗品としての究極形態 全体主義制度の下では、公務員はほとんど制度の消耗品と化します。 このような政体における公務員は、表向きは国家を代表していますが、実態は高圧的な権力システムにおける最初の犠牲者集団なのです。 2. 民主国家におけるスケープゴート構造:世論の下での切り捨てメカニズム 制度が成熟した民主国家においてさえ、公務員は「切り捨てられる運命」から逃れられてはいません。 民主制度が必ずしも穏やかであるとは限りません。ただ、公務員を切り捨てる方法が、より「文明的」であるに過ぎないのです。 三、現代における「制度の駒」としての人生の五大特徴:世界共通の「統制パッケージ」 どの国においても、今日の公務員システムは、非常によく似た、管理しやすい「制度の駒」としての構造的特徴を示しています。 1. 権力と責任の著しい非対称性 限られた実行権しか持たないにもかかわらず、政策の失敗、世論の批判、予算の危機に対して責任を負わなければなりません。真の意思決定者は「法的に免責」され、実行者は「手続きに則って問責」されます。 2. 収入と期待の著しい乖離 世界の多くの国で、公務員の収入は、その仕事の過酷さや公衆からの期待に見合うものではありません。その結果、合法的な範囲外のインセンティブ、すなわち「グレーな収入」を生み出す土壌となります。 3. 忠誠と独立した人格の両立不可能性 多くの国で、「政治的中立」と「制度への忠誠」はしばしば矛盾します。ある公務員があまりに独立して思考すれば、「非協力的な人物」と見なされやすく、逆に従順すぎれば、社会からの信頼を失います。 4. 制度によって腐敗へと誘導され、そして制度によって粛清される 制度は、表向きは清廉潔白を奨励しますが、実際には管理・統制の手段として、多くの「腐敗の余地」を残しています。そして、一度、粛清の必要が生じると、その中から「スケープゴート」を選び出し、不満を鎮めるのです。 5. 最終的に社会の怒りの受け皿となる 貧富の格差、統治の失敗、官僚主義的な作風に対する民衆の不満は、最終的に、資本家や体制の上層部ではなく、「無能で、腐敗し、怠慢で、愚かで、何もしない」公務員へと集中砲火のように浴びせられます。 四、なぜ制度は常に「切り捨て可能な実行部隊」を必要とするのか? 制度は、常に三つの重要な難題を解決しなければなりません。 問題 制度対策 実行効率をいかに維持するか? 体制に従順で、依存的な人々を育成する。 制度の安定性をいかに延長するか? […]

公务员的“制度牛马”人生:全球制度演化下的牺牲者逻辑

公务员的“制度牛马”人生:全球制度演化下的牺牲者逻辑

Daohe · Aug 30, 2025

——跨越历史、文明与制度的制度性操控陷阱 引言:全球性悲剧,制度型设定 在今天的许多国家,不论是民主国家、威权体制,还是新兴政体,“公务员群体”的角色都被困于一种危险而悖谬的结构中: 既要求他们忠诚,却不给他们清白的空间; 既赋予他们权力,却不保障他们的人格; 既要他们维持秩序,却随时能将其当作代罪羔羊。 这种“制度牛马式人生”不是东方独有,也非威权特产,而是全球制度文明长期演化的副产品,是行政官僚体系内部固有的牺牲机制,具有全球普遍性与制度传承性。 一、从古代帝国到殖民体制:公务员的全球“牺牲性”起源 1. 古罗马与波斯帝国:忠诚工具人 vs. 权力收割机 古罗马帝国建立了全世界最早的大型文官系统之一,但这套系统的核心逻辑就是:“执行者无权,责任全责”。地方总督若不能维稳、征税、供应军粮,就可能被元老院弹劾、失职流放,甚至当街处死。 波斯帝国也是如此,其“御使”(即帝国巡查员)虽地位崇高,却是帝王“耳目”与“祭品”合一——一旦被怀疑忠诚动摇,先杀之而后问责。 2. 中世纪教权与王权体系:公务官僚的高压困局 在中世纪的西欧王权与教权共治体系中,王室“书记官”、教廷“执事长”都是顶级公务员,却也是最高风险承担者。许多“替主办事”的高级行政人员死于权斗、背锅与舆情清算。 如英格兰托马斯·贝克特,既是忠臣,也是“政治尸体”。 3. 殖民体系:全球外派官僚的双重囚笼 英、法、荷、西等殖民帝国在全球派驻大量殖民地行政官员,他们既要“平定土著、榨取税收”,又不能得罪母国议会和本地资本。这些人时常在殖民危机、起义失败、经济衰退中成为“第一批牺牲者”。 全球殖民史中的“倒霉总督”,是最真实的制度燃料使用记录。 二、近现代国家的“行政机器”:权力之中被去人格 1. 纳粹德国与苏联体制:制度牲畜的极致形态 在极权制度下,公务员几乎是制度的消耗品: 这种政体下的公务员,表面代表国家,实则是高压权力体系的第一轮牺牲群体。 2. 民主国家的替罪结构:舆情下的抛弃机制 即使在制度成熟的民主国家,公务员也并未逃离“可抛弃性命运”: 民主制度未必更温和,只是抛弃公务员的方式更“文明”。 三、现代“制度牛马”人生的五大特征:全球通行的“操控套件” 无论是在哪个国家,今天的公务员系统都呈现出一种高度相似的“可操控“制度牛马”系统结构”: 1. 权力与责任严重不对称 拥有有限执行权,却必须对政策失误、舆情崩盘、预算危机负责。真正的决策者“法律免责”,执行者则“程序问责”。 2. 收入与期望严重错位 全球多数国家的公务员收入不足以匹配其工作强度与公众期待,从而滋生合法之外的“灰色激励体系、即灰色收入”。 3. 忠诚与独立人格不可共存 在许多国家,“政治中立”与“制度忠诚”常常矛盾。一名公务员若太独立思考,便容易被视为“不合作份子”;若过度服从,又将失去社会信任。 4. 被制度诱腐,再被制度清算 制度在表面上鼓励清廉,但在实际中留下大量“可腐空间”作为控制手段。一旦需要清洗,就从中选出“替罪羊”以平息不满。 5. 最终成为社会愤怒的集装箱 无论是民众对贫富不均、治理失效、官僚作风的怨恨,最终往往集中喷向公务员无能、腐败、躺平、弱智、不作为,而不是资本权贵或体制高层。 四、为什么制度总要一个“可杀的执行群体”? 制度总要解决三个关键难题: 问题 制度对策 如何维持执行效率? 养一群服从且依赖体制的人 如何延长制度稳定性? […]

read more

Related Content

A governance model centered on complete citizens
A governance model centered on complete citizens
Avatar photo
Daohe · Aug 7, 2025
The institutional evolution and historical trajectory of civil politics Produced by Yicheng Commonweal To those who truly love their country I. Opening: Who does true governance belong to? In today’s world, nearly every nation inscribes grand slogans such as “putting people first” or “rule of law” into its political declarations. These phrases are treated as […]
Volunteer Manual
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 4, 2024
Welcome to Our Volunteer Team! Thank you for choosing to join Yicheng Commonweal as a volunteer! We are committed to advancing social civilization, public welfare, and collective well-being through our collective efforts, while spreading love and warmth. This welcome guide will help you integrate smoothly into our team, understand your key responsibilities and expectations, and […]
3 Dreams to a Better World
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 13, 2025
Everyone has their own unique dream for a better world. My dream, however, is to make more people happy. This is not only my pursuit but also my belief — that happiness can be the ultimate destination for everyone, and that human kindness, the connections between people, and collective action can change the temperature of […]
Don’t let a narrow mindset hinder the journey of good deeds
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 17, 2025
On the journey of advancing public welfare, we often encounter the criticism: “Your charity seems too religious.” This is a classic example of a narrow perspective—one that is influenced by bias, limitations, or even misunderstanding, and fails to truly consider the viewpoint of those involved in charitable efforts. To better explain our original intentions, it […]
View All Content