What Is Civilization, the Mysterious Concept that is So Hard to Grasp?

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 7, 2024
This article comes from a volunteer meeting where Daohe shared her insight on the concept of “civilization”. As a member of the volunteer group, I took notes during the discussion and wrote this article later. Please excuse any incomplete or missing details in the article. Introduction Recently, while explaining the vision and mission of Yicheng […]

This article comes from a volunteer meeting where Daohe shared her insight on the concept of “civilization”. As a member of the volunteer group, I took notes during the discussion and wrote this article later. Please excuse any incomplete or missing details in the article.

Introduction

Recently, while explaining the vision and mission of Yicheng Commonweal to others, I noticed something quite strange. Many people lack the understanding of civilization, or they are confused about the concept. So what exactly is civilization? Why is it so abstract and so hard to understand?

When people lack a proper perspective on civilization, it becomes difficult to see the direction of society. This article discusses the concept of civilization and why Yicheng Commonweal was established to promote the advancement of civilization.

I. The Definition of Civilization

Civilization is the sum of the physical and spiritual achievements that human societies accumulate over time. It includes the formation and evolution of political and economic systems, social institutions and laws, culture, and value systems. Civilization is like a house that guarantees the people living inside. The structure, size, and quality of the civilization house—shaped by governance, education, culture, and social welfare—directly influence people’s living conditions and mental state. In essence, the average quality of life and collective well-being in a society depend on its civilization.

Like houses, civilizations vary greatly in quality. Some are like shabby shacks, unable to provide basics for its residents. In contrast, some are like luxurious villas, offering comfort and security. The pursuit of a better life is at the heart of the constant advancement of civilization, which is the driving force behind the continuous advancement of social civilization.

The question is, how do we evaluate the level of civilization in society? The more civilized a society is, the better its systems and institutions support the growth and well-being of its people. A highly civilized society fosters the values and practices of goodness, morality, love, and dignity, encouraging flourishing development across all aspects. In contrast, societies with lower levels of civilization often trample on these values, promote toxic ideologies, and undermine people’s well-being, creating a vicious cycle of decline. 

In a more civilized society, individuals receive greater social support, requiring less effort to achieve success and happiness in life. Instead, in less developed societies, individuals face significant barriers to personal growth and prosperity, often requiring an extraordinary amount of effort—sometimes hundreds or thousands of times more — just to attain what others may take for granted. In these societies, people usually suffer from all sorts of great hardship. 

Once you comprehend what civilization truly means, it becomes clear how societies differ in their levels of civilization. Even now, the disparity in civilization levels between nations and districts is clear, directly corresponding to differences in overall well-being. This can be clearly seen in migration trends. While people may not always have a clear understanding of civilization, the pursuit of well-being is universal, motivating many to move to more developed societies.

II. Civilization Needs to Be Maintained and Upgraded

Without a proper perspective and scale of understanding civilization, it is difficult for people to comprehend the flow of human history and the future direction of civilization, which may result in a few common misconceptions. 

1. The Optimistic View: Observing the economic and scientific achievements of human societies in the past, some people become blindly optimistic, so they believe as society “naturally” develops, human society will keep developing itself.

2. The Pessimistic View: After witnessing the decline and collapse of civilizations throughout history and all sorts of man-made disasters, some conclude that human nature is inherently evil and that human actions are essentially pointless. Seeing this historical pattern, they predict that civilization will inevitably fall again.

3. The Apathy View: Unable to see clearly, some choose to shut their eyes and avoid contemplating these issues. They believe that individual lives have no connection to societal development and that individual success depends solely on personal efforts. Alternatively, they may lack vision for the future and content themselves with living in the present.

In reality, all three of these mindsets are problematic and can lead to  poor life decisions. The development of civilization is not a natural or automatic process. Instead, it is shaped by the choices of individuals within society. History is merely the result and feedback of those choices and actions. The progress of civilization depends on people who are thoughtful, engaged, and dedicated to addressing societal issues. Without their efforts and critical thinking, society will face difficulties in progressing.

When the overwhelming majority of people decide to tolerate and enable evil, rather than pushing for the advancement of goodness, the forces of corruption will rise, causing society to deteriorate. In contrast, when people choose good and virtue, resisting evil and injustice, society will move forward in a positive direction, creating benefits and hope for its people.

Inaction is, in itself, a decision. If people are dissatisfied with their circumstances but choose not to make changes — simply conforming to the status quo — they allow evil to spread and invite man-made disasters. If civilization does not progress toward a better direction, it will stagnate or even regress. As British historian Arnold Toynbee said, Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.

As a result, it is crucial for individuals to actively maintain and advance the various systems and institutions within society, including the economy, politics, education, law, culture, and welfare systems. This kind of social practice is what will steadily elevate people’s living standards, bringing sustained happiness and hope, and enabling the “house” of civilization to grow and upgrade.

III. The Different Stages of Human Civilization

Throughout history, human society has progressed through various stages of civilization, each marked by distinct characteristics and systems. These stages can broadly be divided into three major categories: the Slave Society, the Feudal Society, the Capitalist Society.  In the future, we will soon witness the emergence of the Social Citizen Society.

1. The Slave Society: The system is based on the complete dehumanization of one group for the benefit of another. The fundamental belief in this society is that some people are meant to serve others, and the slaves themselves internalize this belief, seeing themselves as inherently subordinate.

2. The Feudal Society: This system was built upon coercion, deception, and the consolidation of power by a select few. People were expected to focus solely on their own lives and the well-being of their families, showing little interest in the larger social or political changes occurring around them.

3. The Capitalist Society: This system is based on business employment, commercial transactions, labor exploitation, and financial manipulation, where power is concentrated in the hands of capitalists and financiers. People are at risk of being exploited by capital interests and deceived by financial institutions. The values of freedom, equality, democracy are widely recognized and people participate in politics mainly to protect their personal interests as well as secure their rights.

4. The Social Citizen Society: It is based on a capitalist financial system that operates on principles of cooperation, mutual benefit, co-creation, and shared prosperity. Compared with the current capitalist system, it mainly serves the interests of social citizens instead of capitalists. The ideals of freedom, democracy, equality, and creativity resonate deeply, empowering people to become the leaders and catalysts of social progress.

The differences between these stages of civilization have led to significant disparities in the quality of life and cultural values around the world. While some societies on Earth are heading towards social citizen society, some are still struggling in the model of feudal society, leading to great gap in quality of life and cultural values among different regions. It is a heartbreaking fact, and the reason why we are so committed to civilization education.

IV. Faith is the Soul of Civilization

Faith remains a constant force in human civilization, like the sun in the sky—unaffected by progress or decline. Faith is the driving force behind humanity’s pursuit of goodness and virtue. It is the deep, inherent choice within the soul of every individual. Without the support and guidance of faith, acts of kindness and goodness are hard to sustain. In societies where civilization is underdeveloped, faith serves as the only form of salvation, providing the motivation for people to act and the spiritual strength to guide societal transformation.

Faith is not limited to religions. It encompasses any value system that promotes goodness and virtue. Some may not believe in any religion but instead hold firm to ideals such as freedom, equality, democracy, and justice. These beliefs guide individuals toward societal progress. This is why Yicheng Commonweal focuses on enhancing and developing faith—recognizing all beliefs that inspire positive change.

V. Education Shapes the Future of Civilization

Education is the key to nurturing the next generation of leaders. The security and well-being of society in the future will depend on the systems we build today, as well as the quality of the education we provide. This obvious truth is often overlooked, yet it is the key to long-term social stability and progress. Education equips individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to lead and innovate, and these leaders are the ones who will shape the future direction of society.

Outdated education systems produce individuals who are ill-prepared to meet the demands of an ever-evolving world. When education fails to adapt to new challenges and emerging needs, it creates a gap between what society requires and the talents it produces. This disconnect leads to stagnation, where social development lacks momentum and the potential for future progress diminishes. 

On the other hand, by nurturing individuals who are equipped with the right skills, values, and critical thinking abilities, education fosters innovation, creativity, and leadership, enabling society to evolve and thrive.

Daohe also shared her insight on some of the myths people have about civilization.

1. The level of civilization in society is determined by its economic progress.

Economic development is a necessary condition for the progress of civilization and a reflection of that progress, but it is not a sufficient condition. A more advanced civilization tends to nurture greater intellectual freedom and creativity, encouraging people to work together, share, and support one another, which drives further economic progress.

However, as mentioned earlier, civilization encompasses various systems and institutions within a society. While the economic system is a key aspect, it is just one part of the broader system. Political structures, cultural norms, and other systems—both tangible and intangible—also impact the progression of civilization and shape a society’s development. Even in a society with a strong economy, if other systems fall behind, it weakens the ability to handle risks and undermines the potential for long-term progress.

A historical example can be found in the Punic Wars, fought between the Roman and Carthaginian Empires in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE. Despite Carthage’s commercial prosperity and naval power, it was defeated by Rome, which had less economic and military strength. What factors contributed to Carthage’s defeat?

The reason behind Rome’s triumph lies in the fact that, except for its naval and economic strength, it was far more advanced than Carthage in key areas such as politics, law, and diplomacy. Moreover, Roman society was bound together by a strong sense of patriotism, where the preservation of the state was the ultimate value. This cultural cohesion gave them the strength to endure hardships and continue fighting, even when facing significant losses.

On the other hand, Carthage was prosperous—its wealth was precisely what made it a target for Roman expansion. However, rather than relying on a dedicated citizen army, Carthage hired foreign mercenaries, as its people were more concerned with commercial gain than defending their nation. As a result, the mercenaries lacked loyalty, and some even betrayed Carthage during their defeats by switching allegiance to Rome. Even the military genius of Hannibal failed to save Carthage, as the government failed to give him the support he needed, which contributed to the eventual collapse of the empire.

This makes it clear that while economic development offers significant benefits to society, it must be supported by other systems. Without this, economic progress may become a destructive temptation for others. Even without external pressures, a society that neglects cultural and intellectual growth can become lost in confusion and disillusionment, paving the way for corruption to flourish.

2. Civilization is the moral level of a society. In primitive tribes, the system was generally communal, with no appearance or division of social classes, making primitive tribes more “civilized”.

Firstly, during the time of primitive tribes, human societies were small in scale and characterized by low productivity. Advanced systems of labor division and collaboration had yet to develop. Living relied on direct sharing of resources and basic production methods, not on the complex organization seen in technologically, culturally, and economically advanced societies. Therefore, discussing the “level of civilization” at this point in history is irrelevant.

Secondly, the lifestyle and relationships among members of the tribe were more shaped by the need to survive than by any high moral standards. To survive, they adopted the most practical approach to resource sharing given their circumstances.

Directly associating the resource allocation systems of primitive tribes with moral standards or the level of civilization is a misinterpretation and oversimplification of the concept of “civilization.” Civilization’s true essence lies in how efficiently a society organizes and manages itself to enhance the well-being of all its members while safeguarding individual interests.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

单纯的你需要回归上帝的爱

单纯的你需要回归上帝的爱

Master Wonder · Oct 23, 2024

单纯的你,总是想是不是我做错了什么才会让对方生气。实际上你并没有做错什么,只是需要你回到上帝的身边才会真正的快乐幸福起来。 生活中,单纯的人总是善于自我反思和检讨。当他人表现出不满或生气时,单纯的你可能会下意识地责备自己,总觉得是不是自己哪里做错了。然而,事实往往并非如此。并不是你的行为引发了别人的情绪,而是我们需要一种更高层次的精神寄托和心灵支撑——那就是回到上帝的身边,找到内心的安宁与幸福。 单纯的你,总是在自我怀疑中徘徊 单纯的人往往具有高度的自省能力,总是努力取悦他人,避免冲突和不快。然而,这种过度的自我反思容易让人陷入自责的循环中,特别是在他人表现出愤怒或冷漠的时候。你可能会想:“是不是我哪里做得不够好?是不是我说错了话?”这种不断的自我怀疑不仅消耗了你的精力,也使你在关系中感到疲惫和失落。 实际上,别人的情绪和反应有时与我们无关。每个人都有自己的压力和烦恼,不是每一种情绪的起因都来自于他人。善于自省是一种美德,但当这种自省变得过度时,就会成为负担,让你总是感到自己不够好。 回到上帝的身边,找回真正的内心平静 在面对人际关系的困扰和自我怀疑时,回到上帝的身边能够帮助你找到内心的安宁。信仰不仅仅是一种宗教仪式,更是一种心灵的寄托。当你将心中的烦恼和疑惑交托给上帝时,你会发现许多事情变得不再重要。上帝的教义传达着爱与宽恕的精神,这能够让你学会宽恕自己,理解自己,并不再为他人的情绪而苦恼。 上帝的怀抱是安全的港湾,在那里你可以尽情倾诉、释放压力,并得到心灵的抚慰。通过信仰,你可以重新审视自己的人生价值,不再因为他人的情绪而动摇自己的信念,获得一种真正的心灵自由。 明白幸福的来源:不是取悦他人,而是信仰中的满足 单纯的人往往倾向于通过取悦他人来获得幸福感,但这并不是一种可持续的幸福来源。无论我们多么努力,总会有人因为自己的情绪或外在环境的影响而表现出不满。而真正的幸福,不在于他人的评价,而在于我们内心的满足与平静。上帝的爱是无条件的,它不会因为你偶尔的失误或别人的情绪而有所变化。在信仰中,你可以找到一种持久的、源自内心的幸福。 信仰帮助人们明白,生活中的挑战和困境是不可避免的,我们并不能控制所有事情的发生,但我们可以控制自己如何去面对。当你将幸福的源泉寄托在信仰中,而不是依赖外界的认同时,你会发现内心的平和与满足变得更加稳固和持久。 在上帝的怀抱中,学会接受自己的不完美 单纯的人通常对自己有较高的要求,总是期望能够完美无瑕。然而,世界上没有人是完美的,每个人都会犯错。上帝的教导让我们学会接受自己的不完美,明白即便我们有缺点,也依然值得被爱和宽恕。在信仰的支持下,你可以不再苛求自己做到面面俱到,不再因别人的情绪而否定自我价值。 上帝的爱是一种无条件的接纳,它让你在面对挫折时感受到一种温暖的力量。信仰不仅教会我们爱别人,也教会我们如何去爱自己,这种爱能够治愈内心的创伤,帮助我们重新找回那份简单的幸福。

人生的三種層次與三種思維

Daohe · Oct 23, 2024

在生活的道路上,每個人都會面對不同的選擇和追求,而這些選擇往往體現了他們的思維方式和人生層次。可以將人生的層次以三種不同的思維來劃分:草根思維、精英思維和強者思維。每一種思維都有其獨特的邏輯和價值取向,塑造著人們對待生活的態度和方式。 第一層次:草根思維 草根思維的底層邏輯是大眾思維。對於這種思維方式的人來說,人生沒有明確的目標,一切的努力和進取只是為了更好地享受當下。他們追求的可能是日常的安逸、短期的快樂或是簡單的滿足,重視當下的享受勝過長遠的規劃。因此,在生活中他們更容易隨波逐流,缺乏長遠的願景和深刻的思考。 草根思維往往在社會的底層較為普遍,因為這種思維與追求眼前利益和安全感的心態緊密相關。在生活的壓力下,許多人會選擇這種思維方式,因為它簡單、直接,並能在短期內提供滿足感。然而,草根思維的局限在於,它容易使人沉溺於現狀而缺乏進取精神,難以突破現有的生活圈子和自我認知。 草根思維並不只是存在於社會底層中,有不少人擁有社會資源,卻不懂得如何合理規劃,長遠打算。一個典型的例子是古羅馬的皇帝尼祿,他以奢華、享樂和荒淫無度而著稱。他的執政並沒有明確的政治目標或長遠的國家規劃,更多的是追求個人的享受和奢侈的生活。他熱衷於音樂和藝術,甚至親自上台表演,對國家事務漠不關心。在羅馬大火期間,他被傳言在縱火後的夜晚彈琴吟詩,儘管有爭議,但這種形象反映了他對民生和治理的輕視。 尼祿的行為代表了草根思維中的短視和自我中心,他缺乏更高的理想或社會責任感,專注於個人的感官享受,最終導致了民眾的反抗和自己的覆滅。 他的統治也因奢靡和殘暴而被認為是羅馬帝國衰落的一個重要原因,可見草根思維如果出現在掌權者身上,危害更大,如果缺乏遠見和責任,最終可能會導致個人和社會的雙重失敗。 第二層次:精英思維 精英思維以「什麼是最好、最優秀」為底層邏輯,人生的目標不再是單純的享受,而是追求金錢、權力或社會地位的高度。這種思維方式認為,只有通過不斷的努力和奮鬥,才能獲得自己想要的一切。因此,精英思維者往往擁有明確的目標,並以此為驅動力,不斷提升自我,實現個人的成功和價值。 這種思維方式常見於那些擁有物質優勢或出身較好的群體,但也存在於一些自我奮鬥的草根人士當中。精英思維激勵著人們去突破自我,追求更高的成就和社會地位。然而,有精英思維的人往往將物質上的成就和社會的認可看得過重,而忽略了內心的真正需求以及生活的深層意義,忽略了對他人与社會的愛與關懷,從而變得冷漠,無法與自我和他人真正連結。 拿破崙·波拿巴是典型的精英思維的代表人物。他出身普通,但憑藉著不懈的努力和卓越的軍事才能,最終成為了法蘭西第一帝國的皇帝。拿破崙的目標明確,就是要透過不斷的征戰和擴張來建立一個強大的帝國,實現個人的雄心壯志。他的整個生涯充滿了挑戰和野心,從一個普通的軍官到掌控歐洲的皇帝,他始終在追求權力的巔峰。 拿破崙的精英思維體現在他對權力的渴望和對成就的不斷追求,他通過個人的努力和領導才能獲得了廣泛的社會地位和歷史影響力,但他的失敗也提醒人們,精英思維過度追求物質和權力時,可能會忽略其他重要的價值。 第三層次:強者思維 強者思維的底層邏輯是「愛與慈悲」。在這種思維方式中,人生同樣沒有特定的目標,但因為對人間疾苦的深刻感知,他們常常心生悲憫之情,願意為他人排憂解難。強者思維者的內心深處確立了一個為他人服務、化解痛苦的人生目標和態度,這種目標並不是外在強加的,而是源於對人類苦難的深刻理解和內心的無私關懷。 有趣的是,很多強者思維的人往往並非出身優越,而是來自底層。他們通過自己的人生經歷,對生活的艱辛有著深刻的感受,這種感受使得他們在面對他人的痛苦時,選擇主動承擔責任,而不是僅僅追求個人的利益。這種思維方式不僅賦予了他們強大的內在力量,也使他們具備了更廣闊的胸襟和更高的精神境界。 聖雄甘地是強者思維的典型代表。甘地出身於印度的一個普通家庭,雖然他後來成為一名律師並有機會過上相對優越的生活,但他選擇了帶領印度民眾爭取獨立的道路。他倡導「非暴力不合作」的原則,為了民眾的福祉和社會的正義,他多次絕食抗議,甘願承受身體上的痛苦。他的目標並不是個人的榮譽或財富,而是通過自己的行動來改變整個社會,幫助人民擺脫殖民統治的壓迫。 甘地的強者思維體現為他超越了個人利益,將愛與慈悲作為行動的核心,立志為人類服務,解決社會的不公和痛苦。他的思想和行為影響深遠,不僅在印度,也為世界範圍內的和平運動提供了寶貴的精神財富。 透過這些歷史人物的故事,我們可以看到不同的人生態度和追求方向,同時也看到了不同的思維方式如何塑造了他們的人生軌跡和成就。草根思維如尼祿是古羅馬的皇帝,注重眼前的生活樂趣;精英思維如拿破崙,追求權力和成就的巔峰;而強者思維如甘地,則超越了個人的追求,以慈悲和愛為動力,為他人和社會做出了巨大貢獻。不同的思維方式不僅影響個人的生活方式,也在歷史長河中留下了不同的印記。

read more

Related Content

Yicheng Commonweal in Action: Empowering Volunteers to Become Future Organizers and Leaders
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 19, 2024
At Yicheng Commonweal, we are dedicated to continuous exploration and innovation. Our volunteers share a deep sense of social responsibility and a strong capacity for personal and spiritual growth. Here, volunteers contribute to our cause through their actions while developing the ability to drive social progress. We aim to transform volunteers into future organizers and […]
3 Dreams to a Better World
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 13, 2025
Everyone has their own unique dream for a better world. My dream, however, is to make more people happy. This is not only my pursuit but also my belief — that happiness can be the ultimate destination for everyone, and that human kindness, the connections between people, and collective action can change the temperature of […]
A governance model centered on complete citizens
A governance model centered on complete citizens
Avatar photo
Daohe · Aug 7, 2025
The institutional evolution and historical trajectory of civil politics Produced by Yicheng Commonweal To those who truly love their country I. Opening: Who does true governance belong to? In today’s world, nearly every nation inscribes grand slogans such as “putting people first” or “rule of law” into its political declarations. These phrases are treated as […]
Don’t let a narrow mindset hinder the journey of good deeds
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 17, 2025
On the journey of advancing public welfare, we often encounter the criticism: “Your charity seems too religious.” This is a classic example of a narrow perspective—one that is influenced by bias, limitations, or even misunderstanding, and fails to truly consider the viewpoint of those involved in charitable efforts. To better explain our original intentions, it […]
View All Content