Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

教育的差距就是文明的差距

Daohe · Nov 4, 2024

对教育差距的一些思考 引言 在不同的历史时期,教育的差距一直是文明差距的重要表现。教育是塑造个人素质、构建社会文化与价值观、推动科技创新的基石,而教育水平的不同直接影响了社会的文明程度。纵观人类历史不难发现,那些率先实现教育改革的国家,往往在经济、科技、思想等方面引领全球,或者将要如此;而教育资源不足、质量落后的地区,文明发展也随之停滞。本文将以几个关键的历史阶段为例,探讨教育差距如何造成文明的差距。 一、古典时期:教育的启蒙与文明的发端 在古希腊和古罗马时期,公民教育体系率先得以发展,推动了西方文明的崛起。古希腊强调理性、哲学和辩论,公民在学校中学习逻辑、伦理等知识,形成了对人性和世界的深刻理解。罗马的教育注重法律、军事和行政技能,为帝国的治理提供了稳定的基础。然而,彼时的世界其他地区在教育上多还停留在奴隶教育,教育内容仅限于少数经典或宗教教义,知识传播渠道狭窄,社会思想闭塞,普遍缺乏理性讨论。教育上的差距使得古希腊、古罗马的文明进步显著,国力强盛,奠定了其在思想和制度上的领先地位。 二、中世纪:宗教教育的限制导致文明停滞 在中世纪的欧洲,教育几乎完全被宗教主导。教会垄断了知识的传播与掌控,教育内容局限在神学和少数经典,压抑了自由思想的萌芽。这一时期欧洲的“黑暗时代”与此有很大关联。社会缺乏对科学和理性的探索,思想局限使得文明发展停滞,直到文艺复兴才打破了这一禁锢。相对的,在伊斯兰世界的早期,教育体系较为开放,知识涵盖数学、天文学、医学等多方面,使得伊斯兰文明在相对较短的时间内获得了长足发展。这一历史阶段显示,教育内容的多元与开放性决定了文明的发展活力。 三、文艺复兴与启蒙时期:教育改革弥合文明差距 从文艺复兴到启蒙运动时期,欧洲社会逐步摆脱了宗教教育的束缚,教育重新关注人性、理性和科学探索。这一阶段,欧洲教育系统在哲学、文学、自然科学等领域逐渐多元化,推动了科技进步和社会解放,使得欧洲文明在短时间内赶超其他地区。卢梭、康德等启蒙思想家提倡通过教育提升个人与社会素质,为现代民主制度和法治思想奠定了基础。欧洲的教育改革迅速弥合了中世纪的文明落后状态,再次凸显了教育水平与文明进步之间的紧密关系。 四、工业化阶段:教育差距与现代文明的断层 19世纪的工业革命催生了大规模的现代化进程,欧美国家率先普及了义务教育,以满足工业化和城市化对劳动力的需求。然而,在当时的许多殖民地和非工业化国家,教育资源依旧匮乏,许多人甚至没有接受基础教育的机会。这导致这些地区的科技、经济发展明显滞后,文明进程被远远甩在了后面。印度和中国等地虽是古代文明的佼佼者,但由于长期未能普及现代教育制度,在这一时期的文明发展上明显落后于西方。这一阶段中,教育的不均衡带来了文明的分层,直接导致了全球格局的不平等。 五、现代教育阶段:科技进步中的教育鸿沟 20世纪中叶以来,科技的进步带动了教育模式的革新,发达国家纷纷采用科技手段提高教育质量,普及批判性思维,重视创新思维的培养,教育更加注重人文思想和文化培养。然而,在许多欠发达国家和地区,教育资源的严重短缺使大量青少年难以接受优质教育。这一教育差距直接造成了全球文明进程的不平衡,许多地区在公民思想、科技、法律意识、公共卫生等方面的发展落后于发达国家。以非洲部分地区为例,由于教育落后,民众的法律意识和基本科学知识普及率较低,影响了社会的文明程度,无法参与全球化带来的机遇。现代阶段的教育差距持续拉大了文明差距,限制了全球共同发展的步伐。 六、未来教育阶段:教育滞后或将加剧文明差距 21世纪以来,人工智能、虚拟现实等新兴技术推动了教育模式的进一步升级,未来教育将更加个性化、智能化、思想化。然而,发达国家与欠发达国家在教育科技的融合上依旧存在巨大差距,这一差距将进一步影响未来文明的分布。在未来,教育的滞后将更显著地加剧文明差距,尤其是那些未能将教育与科技紧密结合的地区,将可能在全球文明进程中处于边缘。如果这一教育鸿沟得不到有效解决,全球文明将很难实现共同进步,贫富差距和地区差异将愈加严重。 结语 教育差距与文明差距之间的关系贯穿了整个人类历史。那些在教育上率先突破、实现进步的社会,往往在文明进程中取得领先地位;而教育资源匮乏、质量低下的地区则难以跟上全球文明发展的步伐。未来,弥合教育差距不仅是推动社会公正和平等的需要,更是实现全球文明进步的必经之路。唯有打破教育壁垒、实现资源公平,才能为人类创造更加繁荣、和谐的文明未来。

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
View All Content