Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

体制、制度与技术的关系——决定文明进步的隐性力量

体制、制度与技术的关系——决定文明进步的隐性力量

Kishou · Jun 13, 2025

本内容强调文明进步的关键在于体制而非技术。体制定义了社会资源的组织与权力结构。体制弹性决定制度的优化与技术的有效利用,进而影响文明的走向。有效的体制可促进繁荣,反之则导致崩塌。技术只为体制服务。

この世界で昼夜止むことのない「潮騒」

Master Wonder · Jun 12, 2025

この世界で最も大きく響き渡る声は、賛美でも、祈願でも、勧告でもなく、「嘲笑」です。 それは、影のように付きまとい、昼も夜も止むことのない「潮騒」のようなものです。轟音を立てて押し寄せる大波とは違い、それは囁き声のように、あらゆる場所に浸透し、すべての人の心の中を流れていきます。それは千の顔、百の顔で現れますが、その本質はただ一つ——未知なるものへの恐怖、そして自らの範疇に属さない全ての物事に対する、本能的な拒絶と揶揄なのです。 無感覚な者は、覚醒した者を嘲笑います。 なぜなら、覚醒した者は、無感覚な者が見ている幻の夢をかき乱すからです。 かつて屈原が『離騒』を書き、楚王に諫言した時、彼は逆に群臣から「狂人」と嘲られました。魯迅が医学を捨てて文学の道に進み、世の病理を暴いた時、「辛辣だ、過激だ、悲観的だ」と皮肉られました。そして今日、社会の病巣をあえて指摘し、制度の深層的な原因を問う人々は、決まって「青二才」「ネット弁慶」「問題ばかり起こす」と罵られます。 世の人々は、慣れ親しんだ苦境の中にうずくまり、束の間の満腹と偽りの安全を享受することを好み、現実の荒廃を直視しようとはしません。だから、誰かが暗闇を指させば、彼らはその人を狂っていると言います。誰かが松明を高く掲げれば、彼らはその人を世界を救おうと夢想している、と揶揄するのです。 臆病な者は、勇敢な者を嘲笑います。 なぜなら、勇敢な者は、彼らの惨めさを明らかにしてしまうからです。 映画『ショーシャンクの空に』で、アンディが刑務所の屋上でビールのために交渉した時、彼は「英雄気取り」と嘲笑されました。現実でも、正義のために立ち上がって声を上げる人がいれば、SNSのコメント欄や掲示板では、「お節介」「面倒事を自ら招いている」「他の誰も気にしていないのになぜ君だけが興奮しているのか」といった言葉が後を絶ちません。 世の中には、「流れに従うのが賢明だ」「我が身が第一だ」と口では言いながら、夜の闇の中で、流れに逆らって進む勇気を持つ人々を密かに羨んでいる者が、どれほど多いことでしょう。自らの臆病さを覆い隠すために、彼らは前進する者を「無駄なことを」「身の程知らずだ」と嘲り、他者が失敗する可能性を、自らが安穏と生き続けるための最後の隠れ蓑にするのです。 偽善者は、正義を貫く者を嘲笑います。 なぜなら、正義を貫く者は、偽善者の醜さを照らし出してしまうからです。 インターネット上で、誰かが社会の底辺で苦しむ人々のために声を上げると、すぐさま「聖人ぶるな」「できるものならお前がやれ」と食って掛かる人々が現れます。彼らはしばしば道徳の衣をまといながら、自らの利益のためだけに行動し、口では「天下万民」「衆生は平等」と言いながら、いざ是非を問われる場面に直面すると、途端に権力や利益と結託します。 正義の光にその本性を暴かれるのを避けるため、彼らは先手を打って、原則を固守する人々を、過激で、偏狭な、偽善者として描き出すことを好むのです。 無知な者は、知識を持つ者を嘲笑います。 なぜなら、知識は、彼らに劣等感を抱かせるからです。 「そんなに本を読んで、何か役に立つのか?」「学問で飯が食えるか?」「理屈をこねるだけなら誰でもできる」。これらの言葉は、会食の席や、同僚との雑談、ショート動画のコメント欄で頻繁に耳にします。 無知な者の目には、複雑な思考、集団に馴染まない見解、そして世界の法則を探究する行為のすべてが、余計で、無用で、虚しいものとして映ります。 「あまり真面目になるな、皆ただ生きるためにやっているだけだ」と諭してくる人々が最も恐れるのは、誰かが本当に真剣になり、本当に思考し、本当にルールの本質を見抜いてしまうことなのです。 その場しのぎで生きる者は、光を求める者を嘲笑います。 なぜなら、光は、彼らがいる暗闇を照らし出してしまうからです。 映画『シンドラーのリスト』で、シンドラーが危険を冒してユダヤ人を救った時、彼の周りの商人たちは「余計な世話だ」と揶揄しました。現実の生活でも、山間部で教育支援をする人、農家を助けるライブ配信をする人、野良犬を保護する人に対して、「売名行為」「ただのショー」「注目されたいだけ」と冷笑する人が必ずいます。 その場しのぎで生きる人々は、この世界がより良くなる可能性があることを認める勇気がなく、人間性には別の可能性があることを信じようとせず、目の前にあるわずかな利益を手放そうとはしません。 彼らは言います、「君は純粋すぎる」と。まるで、この世で唯一の成熟とは、流れに身を任せ、利を見て義を忘れ、運命を受け入れて無気力に生きることであるかのように。 停滞する者は、前進する者を嘲笑います。 なぜなら、前へ進む人々は、彼らが立ち止まっていることを、無言のうちに思い知らせるからです。 多くの企業で、誰かが自発的に残業して研究したり、改善案を提出したりすると、同僚から「目立ちたがり屋」「ごますり」と嘲笑されます。学術の世界では、真面目に研究する人が、同業者から「本の虫」「世間知らず」と揶揄されます。路上でトレーニングする人や、朝にジョギングする人でさえ、「今さら何をそんなに頑張っているのか」と揶揄されることがあります。 ある社会で最も起こりやすいのは、全員が一緒にゆっくりと沈んでいき、それに抵抗する者を「異端」として断罪することです。改善する勇気を持つ者は、落ち着きのない者として非難され、変化を渇望する者は、問題を起こす者と見なされるのです。 甚だしきに至っては、貧しい者もまた、富める者を嘲笑います。 それは、貧しいことがいかに尊敬に値するか、ということではありません。彼らが、自らの運命の中に、自分自身の選択によって決定された部分があることを認めたくないからです。そこで、富める者は皆、「不正」「近道」「コネ」といったレッテルを貼られます。「金持ちにろくな人間はいない」「その金がどこから来たか、分かったものではない」。まるで、一つの偏見が、自らの全ての不作為を帳消しにしてくれるかのようです。 こうして、貧しさは一種の「高潔さ」を示す勲章となり、富は一種の「疑わしい」罪の証拠と成り下がるのです。 こうして、この世界では、「嘲笑」という名の潮騒が、昼夜を問わず満ち引きを繰り返しています。それは音もなく一つひとつの魂を包囲し、人々の個性を削り取り、異質な者や孤独に行く者を群れから追い出し、光を求める者を闇へと追いやります。そして、あえて問いを発する勇気のある者を、恥辱の柱に釘付けにするのです。 しかし、本当に警戒すべきは、嘲笑そのものではありません。その背後に隠された恐怖です——未知なるものへの恐怖、変化への恐怖、そして自己の幻想を失うことへの恐怖です。 この潮騒の中で、もしあなたが自らの灯火を守り抜きたいと願うなら、風や波と共に眠り、孤独を伴侶とし、揶揄と共に行くことを学ばねばなりません。 なぜなら、この世の真の強者とは、決して波しぶきを気にすることなく、ただ対岸だけを見つめている人々だからです。

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content