Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

这方世界昼夜不停的“潮信”

这方世界昼夜不停的“潮信”

Master Wonder · Jun 12, 2025

在这方世界,最响亮的声音,不是赞美,不是祈愿,不是劝诫,而是嘲笑。 那是一种如影随形、昼夜不息的“潮信”。它不像潮水轰然涌来,而是如窸窣细语般,渗透在每个角落,流淌在每个人心底。它以千百种面孔出现,却只有一个本质——对未知的恐惧,对不属于自身范畴的一切,发自本能的拒斥与戏谑。 麻木者嘲笑觉者。因为觉醒之人,扰乱了麻木之人的幻梦。 当年屈原执笔《离骚》,劝谏楚王,反被群臣讥为“疯癫之徒”;鲁迅弃医从文,揭世疾时,被讽刺“尖刻、偏激、唱衰”;今天,凡是敢指出社会病灶、追问制度深因的人,总被骂作“愤青”“键盘侠”“没事找事”。 世人宁可蜷缩在熟悉的困顿里,享受短暂温饱与虚妄安全,也不愿直视真实破败。于是,当有人指向黑暗,他们便说他疯了;当有人高举火炬,他们便讥他妄想拯救世界。 胆小者嘲笑勇敢。因为勇敢者揭示了他们的不堪。 你看,电影《肖申克的救赎》里,安迪在监狱屋顶争取一瓶啤酒,被讥笑“装英雄”;现实里,每一个站出来为正义发声的人,微博评论区、论坛热帖,少不了“多管闲事”“自寻麻烦”“人家都不管你激动啥”。 世上多少人,口口声声“顺势而为”“保命要紧”,却在暗夜里悄悄羡慕那些敢逆水行舟的人。为了掩饰自己的怯懦,他们嘲弄前行者“徒劳”“自不量力”,把别人失败的可能,当作自己苟活下去的遮羞布。 伪善者嘲笑正义。因为正义之人照出了伪善者的丑陋。 网络上但凡有人为底层疾苦发声,立刻有人跳出来:“别装圣母”“你行你上”。他们常常披着道德外衣,行着自利之事,口口声声“天下苍生”“众生平等”,可真正面对是非之际,转身就与权力、利益同流。 为了避免被正义之光照破,他们宁愿先下手为强,将持守原则的人描绘成极端、偏执、伪君子。 无知者嘲笑学识。因为知识让他们感到自卑。 “你读那么多书有用吗?”“做学问能当饭吃?”“讲道理谁不会?”这些话,常常在饭桌聚会、同事闲聊、短视频评论里听见。 在无知者眼里,复杂思考、不合群见解、对世界规律的探究,都是多余、无用、虚妄。 那些劝人“别太认真,大家都混口饭吃就行了”的,最怕的就是有人真的去较真,真的去思考,真的看清了规则。 苟且者嘲笑光明。因为光明昭示了他们所处的黑暗。 在《辛德勒的名单》里,辛德勒冒险救犹太人时,身边商人讥他“多管闲事”;现实生活中,那些去山区支教、助农直播、救助流浪狗的人,总有人冷笑:“炒作”“作秀”“图热度”。 苟且者不敢承认这个世界可以更好,不愿相信人性有另一种可能,不肯放弃眼前一口残羹冷炙。 他们说:“你太天真了”,仿佛世间唯一成熟,就是随波逐流、见利忘义、认命躺平。 退步者嘲笑正进。因为前行的人,无声地在提醒他们停滞不前。 很多企业里,谁要是主动加班钻研、提出优化方案,总被同事嘲笑“爱表现”“拍马屁”;学术圈里,认真做研究的人,被同行讥“死读书”“不通世务”;就连街头健身、晨跑的人,也会有人挤兑:“这年头还折腾啥”。 一个社会最容易发生的,就是让所有人一起缓慢沉沦,然后将反抗者定性为“异端”。凡是敢于改善的人,便被斥为不安分,凡是渴望改变的人,便成了无事生非。 甚至,贫穷者也嘲笑富裕。 不是因为贫穷多么可敬,而是因为他们不愿承认自己命运里那部分由自身选择决定。于是,凡是富裕者,便被冠以“不义”“走捷径”“靠关系”的标签。“有钱的都没好人”“他那钱怎么来的你不知道?”仿佛一句偏见就能抵消自己所有不作为。 贫穷便成为一种“清高”的勋章,而富裕则沦为一种“可疑”的罪证。 于是,这方世界,昼夜涨落着这种名为“嘲笑”的潮信。它悄无声息地围困每一个灵魂,将人们的棱角磨平,将异类与独行者赶出人群,将光明者逐入黑暗,将敢于反问的人钉上耻辱柱。 而那真正值得警惕的,从来不是嘲笑本身,而是嘲笑背后所藏的那股恐惧——对未知的恐惧,对改变的恐惧,对失去自我幻觉的恐惧。 在这片潮信里,若你想守住自己的火光,便要学会与风浪共眠,与孤独相伴,与讥讽同行。 因为世上的真正强者,从不在乎浪花,而只看向彼岸。

Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025

We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]

read more

Related Content

Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
View All Content