Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

教育:文明の光か、支配の道具か

教育:文明の光か、支配の道具か

Daohe · May 17, 2025

文明が遂げるいかなる進歩も、その前方には教育によって灯された火が道を照らしています。教育は、単に個人を形成するだけでなく、時代そのものを彫琢する営みであり、ある社会の形態や権力構造が安定、あるいは変革される上での基礎的なメカニズムです。 自由で文明的な国家において、教育は民衆の知性を開き、人権を保障し、権力を抑制し、社会正義を推進するための礎石と見なされます。その一方で、全体主義的な体制下では、教育は権力機構が民衆を馴化させ、体制を維持し、真実を覆い隠すための政治的道具へと変貌させられます。 アリストテレスが述べたように、「国家の運命は若者の教育にかかっている」のです。全体主義社会において、教育はもはや文明を照らす光源ではなく、支配層が手にする、個人の自由を切り裂き、人格を歪め、認知能力を破壊し、精神的に隷属した人間を作り出すための鋭い道具となります。 本稿では、特定の国家を指すものではなく、過去の歴史的事例を分析素材としながら、権威主義体制がなぜ民主的な教育を拒絶するのか、そして、どのようにして教育システムを体制維持の道具へと変質させるのかを体系的に分析します。 さらに、どのような教材や人材を通じてその統制教育を実施し、社会の中に批判的精神を欠いた民衆をいかにして育成していくのかを考察します。 全体主義国家が民主教育を徹底的に排除する理由 民主教育の核心は、個人の精神がまだ柔軟な発達段階にある時期に、知識の伝達、価値観の啓蒙、そして人格の育成を通じて、個人が独立した思考力、批判的精神、理性的認識、そして権利意識を身につけられるようにすることにあります。この教育形態は、人権の平等、個人の尊厳、権力の抑制と均衡、社会正義、真理の探究を重視し、健全な人格を持つ自立した市民を育成することを目的とします。 一度、民主的な教育を受けると、個人は以下のような能力や意識を持つ可能性があります。 文明社会にとっての民主教育は、植物にとっての太陽、生命にとっての空気のようなものです。それが欠如すれば、文明は枯渇し、社会は腐敗していきます。 全体主義体制の典型である国家は、その統治メカニズムの本質が、権力の高度な独占、情報の厳格な統制、そして民衆の絶対的な服従にあります。もし民主教育を導入すれば、民衆は権利意識、認知的な識別能力、歴史を内省する能力、そして制度を批判する能力を身につけてしまい、全体主義体制の正当性の基盤を著しく揺るがすことになります。 民主教育は、全体主義統治の三大支柱を揺るがします。 どのような知識体系であれ、基礎的な技能のレベルを超え、歴史、哲学、政治、法学、倫理、社会学といった領域に触れると、それは必然的に権力への問いかけという性質を帯びます。知識による啓蒙は、個人の内省と集団の覚醒をもたらし、最終的には体制に開放、改革、あるいは崩壊を迫ることになります。 したがって、全体主義国家は、知識による啓蒙への道を徹底的に遮断しなければなりません。体制にとって都合の良い「偽りの知識」や「断片的な知識」、そして「政治的に正しい知識」のみを広めることを許可し、同時に民主的な教育体系の存在を厳しく禁じることによってのみ、権力構造の安定を確保し、永続的な統治を維持できるのです。 歪められた教育を支える四つの核心的システム 民主教育を排除し、知識による啓蒙を遮断した後、全体主義国家は、体系的で閉鎖的、かつ強制的な教育システムを構築し、人間の認知、感情、人格、価値観を、体制にとって都合の良い形態へと徹底的に再構築しなければなりません。この歪められた教育は、以下の四つの核心的システムに細分化できます。 1. 愚民化教育 この教育の第一の目標は、重要な知識を削減、改竄、隠蔽することを通じて、個人が完全な認知能力を形成するのを妨げ、知識が欠落し、認知能力に偏りがある人間を作り出すことです。 実施方法: 効果: 2. 憎悪教育 「敵」と「味方」を明確に区分し、民族間の憎悪、階級間の対立、国際的な敵対心を煽ることで、偏狭で攻撃的な国民心理を形成します。これは、政権が民衆の感情を操作し、恐怖を維持し、社会の内部矛盾から目を逸らさせるために利用されます。 実施方法: 効果: 3. ファシズム的教育 権力や指導者への絶対的な忠誠と崇拝を強調し、個人の尊厳や価値観を徹底的に否定します。民衆に、個人の意志を「国家」や「指導者」、「民族の運命」といった大きなものの中に溶解させることを求めます。 実施方法: 効果: 4. 奴隷化教育 その根本的な目的は、個人の自由意志と独立した人格を剥奪し、思考せず、反抗せず、尊厳を持たず、ただ命令に従う忠実な人間を育成することにあります。 実施方法: 効果: 歪められた教育の教材構築と運用メカニズム いかなる教育体系も、具体的な教育内容とそれを伝達するための教材なくしては成り立ちません。体制維持を目的とした歪められた教育においては、なおさらです。全体主義国家が、安定的かつ有効な認知統制の枠組みを構築するためには、自らの利益に合致し、個人の認知を抑圧し、隷属性と憎悪を植え付けるための一貫した教材群を、体系的に制作・選別・改編する必要があります。教材から着手することで、知識の生産と歴史の語りに関する主導権を完全に掌握するのです。 このような教材の構築は、単なる教科書編集の問題に留まらず、国家のイデオロギー部門が体系的に計画し、継続的に実行する一大事業です。これらの教材は、民衆の思想を統制するための強力な精神的手段となります。以下に、その核心となる七つの教材構築手法を挙げます。 1. 歴史教科書の改竄 歴史教育は、人の認知体系の根幹を成すものです。全体主義社会がまず着手するのは、例外なく歴史の改竄です。支配集団の過去の非道な行為を英明な判断であったかのように飾り立て、抵抗者を反逆者として中傷し、血塗られた弾圧を正義の勝利であったかのように偽装します。 このような社会において、歴史は客観的な記録ではなく、政治支配の道具に過ぎません。歪められた教育は、まず歴史教科書を体系的に改竄し、史実の中から支配集団にとって不都合な部分、すなわち、その罪や圧政、失敗を明らかにする部分を、徹底的に削除または歪曲します。 具体的な操作方法: 効果: 2. 疑似科学と疑似理論の導入 全体主義国家は、自然科学の領域以外で、思想を束縛するための武器として、疑似科学や疑似理論を広範囲に導入します。これにより、指導者への崇拝、民族の優越性、宿命論、そして敵対勢力による陰謀論などを強化します。 よく見られる疑似理論の素材: これらの内容は、哲学、政治学、社会学の授業として提供され、表面的には学問的な体裁を整えていますが、その実態は極めて非合理的なものです。 効果: 3. 虚偽の英雄像の創作 歪められた教育における第二の核心的な手法は、偽りの英雄や模範的人物を大量に創り出し、社会における真のロールモデルと置き換えることです。これにより、民衆が崇拝し、精神的な支えとするための偶像体系を確立します。 具体的な操作方法: 効果: […]

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes

Daohe · May 17, 2025

Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content