Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

文明とは何か?文明とは、人類の道徳が辿ってきた発展の歴史である

Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025

文明とは、単なる富の蓄積や科学技術の進歩を指すのではありません。それは、人類の歴史全体を貫き、善と悪、公平、正義、そして秩序をめぐる、絶え間ない探求の物語です。宗教、哲学、法律、社会制度といったものは文明の表層に過ぎず、真に文明を絶えず進化させてきた原動力は、人類が道徳に対して行ってきた、思索、検証、そして修正なのです。 文明は、完成品ではなく、持続的に、そして動的に更新され続ける歴史的なプロセスです。 本稿では、歴史を通じて人類の道徳がどのように発展し、文明がどう変遷してきたかを振り返り、皆様が人類文明という概念をより深く理解するための一助となることを目指します。 一、先史時代:道徳の自然な芽生え 初期の狩猟採集社会において、道徳は哲学の産物ではなく、生存のための必要性から生まれました。原始的な人類は、協力、分業、そして分かち合いを通じてでしか、過酷な自然環境の中で生き残ることができませんでした。相互扶助、弱者の保護、そして年長者への敬意は、次第に生存戦略から、集団内で共通して認められる行動規範へと変わっていきました。 考古学者がフランスのラスコー洞窟で発見した壁画には、集団で狩りをする場面が描かれていますが、これは単なる原始的な芸術表現であるだけでなく、初期社会における協調意識の証左でもあります。 また、ネアンデルタール人の墓地で発見された「花を供える埋葬」の痕跡は、彼らがすでに死への畏敬と生命への尊重という観念を持っていたことを示しています。このような、超自然的な力に対する素朴な感受性や、生命の意味に対する初歩的な理解が、最も初期的な道徳の原型を構成したのです。 二、古代文明:体系化された道徳システムの形成 農耕文明の出現と都市国家の成立に伴い、道徳体系は体系化・制度化へと向かい始めました。各古代文明は、宗教、法律、そして哲学を組み合わせることで、それぞれ独自の倫理体系を構築しました。 この段階で、人類文明は自然発生的な生存様式から、理性に基づいた秩序の形成へと移行し、道徳は国家を統治し、社会を維持するための重要な礎石となったのです。 三、中世:宗教道徳の全盛と、その矛盾 中世の時代、宗教は道徳体系の絶対的な中心となりました。ヨーロッパではキリスト教が新たな社会秩序を形成し、個人の倫理から国家の法制度に至るまで、『聖書』がその根拠とされました。教会は、道徳規範を定めただけでなく、宗教教育や慈善活動、救済事業を通じて社会の結束力を高めました。しかしながら、宗教が持つ高い権威は、教義の硬直化や宗教戦争も引き起こし、十字軍の遠征は、宗教道徳が実践において極端な方向へ向かった例証となりました。 イスラム世界では、シャリーア法が、法律という形で経済、公正、家族関係、そして個人の行動を規範化し、慈善を信仰上の義務としました。アッバース朝の時代には、宗教倫理が知識の発展を抑制するどころか、科学の繁栄と共存し、文化と道徳が交錯する黄金時代を形成しました。 東アジアの中世において、仏教は、王権政治と民間倫理という二重の役割を担いました。それは統治者の「仁政」という観念に影響を与えると同時に、民衆の間に深く浸透し、道徳的な制約としての重要な力となりました。 しかし、宗教道徳の体系内部もまた、矛盾に満ちていました。それは、人類の行動を規範化すると同時に、しばしば支配と迫害の道具ともなり、宗教裁判や異端者の火刑は、人類文明の道徳的プロセスにおける、もう一つの側面でした。 四、近代:理性、人権、そして社会正義への覚醒 ルネサンスと啓蒙主義運動は、道徳を宗教の束縛から解放し、理性と人権が道徳の新たな核心となりました。 しかしながら、産業革命がもたらした資本の拡大、労働者の搾取、児童労働の蔓延、そして貧富の格差は、人類を再び道徳的な試練に直面させました。労働運動とマルクス主義思潮が興隆し、「労働に応じた分配」や「搾取の根絶」といった理念を提唱し、社会の公平性を再び道徳体系の核心的な位置へと据え直しました。 近代文明は、こうして神権支配から理性的法治へ、そして社会正義へと至る道徳的な変遷を遂げましたが、同時に、資本の論理と社会的責任との間に存在する矛盾の種を蒔くことにもなったのです。 五、現代文明:グローバル化と、多元的な「国家市民」の道徳体系 現代文明は、グローバル化と科学技術が高速で発展する時代に入り、伝統的な宗教道徳も、初期の理性的な道徳体系も、共に深刻な挑戦に直面しています。 現代の国家市民の道徳体系は、四つの柱の上に成り立っています。 第一に、法的な保障と道徳的な自覚の並行です。市民は法を守るだけでなく、それを自律的な規範として内面化することが求められます。 第二に、個人の創造力と社会的責任の統一です。いかなるイノベーションも、社会全体の幸福を考慮する必要があります。 第三に、多様性への寛容と、対立を調整するメカニズムが、体系の重要な部分となります。これは、文化的な差異がもたらす矛盾に対応するためです。 第四に、持続的な内省と道徳の革新です。科学技術と社会が急速に変化するため、道徳体系には自己修正能力が求められます。 それと同時に、現代の道徳体系は複雑な矛盾に直面しています。国益とグローバルな倫理の対立は日増しに顕著になり、資本の論理は貧富の格差を拡大させ、文化のグローバル化は各地域のアイデンティティの危機をもたらし、科学技術の進歩は道徳規範の更新速度を遥かに上回っています。人工知能(AI)の倫理、遺伝子技術の規制、データ主権といった問題は、人類に、動的に更新可能なグローバルな倫理のプラットフォームを構築することを迫っています。 未来において、グローバルな倫理の一体化は一つの傾向となるでしょう。国家市民の道徳体系は、もはや国境の内側に留まることなく、「地球市民」としての共同責任の枠組みへと移行していくと考えられます。 道徳的な意思決定の民主化、公共の幸福感が評価の基準となること、そして動的な自己修正能力を持つ倫理メカニズム。これらすべてが、未来の文明の指標となるでしょう。 結語 人類文明の歴史を振り返る時、道徳は常に、社会を前進させる目に見えない力として存在してきました。先史時代の生存本能から宗教倫理へ、理性的法治から地球市民の道徳へと、人類は絶えず「何が正義であり、何が善であるか」を問い続けてきたのです。 しかしながら、各時代の道徳体系は、それぞれが固有の限界に直面してきました。宗教道徳は、かつて教義の硬直化と迫害をもたらしました。理性的な道徳は、資本による搾取を完全には解決できませんでした。そして、グローバル化は、公平性と主権をめぐる新たな対立を生み出しています。 現代の国家市民の道徳体系は、グローバル化と科学技術革命という背景の下における、人類の最新の試みです。それは、最も高度な文明の産物であると同時に、まだ未完成の実験でもあります。 持続的な内省、自己修正、そして全人類の共同参加があって初めて、この体系は絶えず完成へと近づき、最終的に、人類文明をより公正で、調和がとれ、持続可能な未来へと導く、光明の灯台となることができるのです。

Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality

Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality

Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025

Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content