Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

何为文明?文明是一部动态的人类道德发展进程史

Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025

文明,并非只是财富的积累或科技的进步,而是一场贯穿整个人类历史、涉及善恶、公平、正义和秩序的不懈探索。宗教、哲学、法律、社会制度等只是文明的表层,真正推动文明不断演进的,是人类对道德的不断思考、检验与修正。 文明不是静态成品,而是一个持续动态更新的历史过程。 本文将回顾历史上人类道德的发展和文明的变迁,让大家更深入地理解人类文明的概念。 一、远古时期:道德的自然萌芽 在早期狩猎采集社会,道德并非哲学的产物,而是生存的需求。原始人类需要通过合作、分工和分享才能在恶劣的自然环境中生存下来。互助、照顾弱者和尊重年长者,逐渐从策略变为群体中共同认可的行为准则。 考古学家在法国拉斯科洞穴中发现的壁画描绘出集体围猎场景,这不仅是一种原始艺术表达,更是早期社会协作意识的见证。 而尼安德特人墓葬中发现的“花葬”现象,显示出他们已具备对死亡的敬畏和对生命的尊重。这种对超自然力量的朴素感知和对生命意义的初步理解,构成了最早的道德雏形。 二、古代文明:系统化道德体系的形成 随着农业文明的出现和城市国家的建立,道德体系开始走向系统化与制度化。各大古代文明都通过宗教、法律和哲学共同构建起各自独特的伦理体系。 这一阶段,人类文明从自然性生存走向理性秩序,道德成为治理国家、维系社会的重要基石。 三、中世纪:宗教道德的极盛与矛盾 中世纪时期,宗教成为道德体系的绝对中心。基督教在欧洲塑造了全新的社会秩序,从个人伦理到国家法制无不以《圣经》为依据。教会不仅规定了道德准则,还通过宗教教育、慈善与救济促进社会凝聚力。然而,宗教的高度权威也带来了教义僵化和宗教战争,十字军东征成为宗教道德在实践中走向极端的例证。 在伊斯兰世界,沙里亚法通过法律形式规范经济、公正、家庭关系与个人行为,并将慈善作为信仰义务。阿拔斯王朝时期,宗教伦理不仅没有抑制知识的发展,反而与科学繁荣并存,形成了文化与道德交织的黄金时代。 佛教在中世纪东亚扮演着帝王政治与民间伦理的双重角色。它影响着统治者的“仁政”观念,同时也深入民间,成为道德约束的重要力量。 然而,宗教道德体系内部同样矛盾丛生。它在规范人类行为的同时,也往往成为控制与迫害的工具,宗教审判与异端焚烧便是人类文明道德进程中的另一面。 四、近代:理性、人权与社会公正的觉醒 文艺复兴与启蒙运动将道德从宗教束缚中解放出来,理性与人权成为道德新的核心。 然而,工业革命带来的资本扩张、劳动剥削、童工泛滥、贫富差距,使人类再次面临道德考验。工人运动与马克思主义思潮兴起,提出“按劳分配”、“消灭剥削”等理念,重新将社会公平放入道德体系的核心位置。 近代文明由此完成了从神权统治到理性法治,再到社会公正的道德演变,但同时也埋下了资本逻辑与社会责任之间矛盾的种子。 五、现代文明——全球化与多元“国家公民”道德体系 现代文明进入全球化和科技高速发展的时代,传统宗教道德体系和早期理性道德体系均面临深刻挑战。 现代国家公民道德体系建立在四大支柱之上:第一,法律保障与道德自觉并行,公民不仅要守法,还要内化为自律;第二,个人创造力与社会责任统一,任何创新都需兼顾社会福祉;第三,多元包容与冲突调节机制成为体系的重要部分,应对文化差异带来的矛盾;第四,持续反思与道德创新,科技和社会快速变化要求道德体系具备自我修正能力。 与此同时,现代道德体系面临复杂矛盾:国家利益与全球伦理冲突日益凸显,资本逻辑加剧贫富不均,文化全球化带来本土认同危机,科技进步远超道德规范更新速度。人工智能伦理、基因技术监管、数据主权等问题,迫使人类建立动态更新的全球伦理平台。 未来,全球伦理一体化将成为趋势,国家公民道德体系将不再停留在国界内,而转向“全球公民”共同责任框架。 道德决策的民主化、公共幸福感作为衡量标准、动态自我修正的伦理机制,都将成为未来文明的标志。 结语 回顾人类文明史,道德始终是推动社会前进的隐形力量。从远古生存本能到宗教伦理,从理性法治到全球公民道德,人类不断追问“何为正义、何为善”。 然而,每一个时代的道德体系都面临自己的局限。宗教道德曾带来教义僵化与迫害;理性道德无法彻底解决资本剥削;全球化带来了新的公平与主权冲突。 现代国家公民道德体系,是人类在全球化和科技革命背景下的最新尝试,它既是最高级的文明产物,也是一个未完成的实验。 只有在持续反思、自我修正、全人类共同参与下,才可能不断趋向完善,最终成为指引人类文明迈向更加公正、和谐与可持续未来的光明灯塔。

认识礼教、理教与政教的区别

Yicheng · Mar 25, 2025

在人类社会的发展过程中,思想体系与社会结构相互交织,形成了不同的文化与治理模式。其中,礼教、理教和政教是三种具有代表性的思想体系,它们分别涉及社会秩序的维系、宇宙法则的探索以及政治权力的运作。 它们相互联系,却有本质区别。正确认识三者的不同,可以更加深入地了解人类社会的文化发展与治理模式。 一、礼教:维持社会秩序的道德与礼仪体系 礼教以“礼”为核心,强调通过礼仪、规矩和社会等级制度来维持社会稳定。它不仅是一种行为规范,更是一套完整的道德体系,影响着政治、家庭、社会等各个层面。 礼教的主要内容: 需要注意的是,符合礼教的做法并不一定是“正确”的。很多情况下,礼教以牺牲一部分人的利益为前提存在。而随着时代的发展,礼教也会发生相应的变化。 不同社会的道德标准和文化信仰不同,在礼教这方面也会有相应的区别,即文化差异。而文化上的差异,也常常体现出文明程度的差别。 中国礼教的历史演变 礼教的影响 二、理教:探索宇宙法则的哲学与宗教体系 理教以“理”为核心,关注宇宙的本质、自然法则以及人与世界的关系。不同于礼教强调社会秩序,理教更倾向于通过思辨与信仰来解释世界的运作方式。 理教的主要内容 1. 宇宙秩序与自然法则:理教强调世界并非混乱无序的,而是遵循某种内在规律。例如,道家提出“道法自然”,认为万物运行有其自身的法则;佛教强调“缘起性空”,认为世间万物因果相生;基督教认为上帝制定了宇宙法则。 2. 人的修行与智慧:理教通常包含修行的内容,如佛教的禅修、道教的炼丹、理学的格物致知等,目的是提升个体智慧,使人认识世界的本质。 3. 超越人伦关系的追求:理教不像礼教那样关注社会伦理,而是更关注个人的精神世界、人与自然的关系。例如,佛教追求解脱,道教倡导天人合一,基督教强调灵魂的救赎。  理教的影响 三、政教:以宗教统治国家的政治体系 政教是宗教与政治权力的结合,指通过宗教信仰治理国家或巩固政权。政教合一的国家通常由宗教领袖掌权,宗教教义成为法律与社会规范的基础。 政教的主要表现 政教的影响 三者的区别 礼教 理教 政教 关注点 社会秩序 世界本质 政治权力 方式 伦理、礼仪 思辨、修行 宗教治理 影响 稳定社会但可能压制个体 促进思想但可能过于抽象 巩固政权但可能抑制自由 礼教、理教和政教各有其价值,合理结合能促进社会发展,但过度依赖任何一种都可能带来弊端。

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
View All Content