Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Growth Mindset: Why It Matters and How to Develop It

Growth Mindset: Why It Matters and How to Develop It

Daohe · Mar 25, 2025

Two Roads for One Pair of Legs: Choosing Between Fixed and Growth Mindsets The way people perceive the world shapes their growth and life path, especially when they encounter difficulties, failures, and challenges. Different mindsets lead to distinct outcomes. No matter where you start or how talented you are, having a growth mindset keeps you […]

思维决定人生成败:成长性思维VS固化思维

Daohe · Mar 25, 2025

一双腿的两种行径 人们对世界的认知方式很大程度影响了他们的成长轨迹和人生道路,尤其是当人们面对困难、失败与挑战的时候,不同思维导向的道路截然不同。 哪怕一个人天资平平,起点不高,只要他拥有成长性思维,他就总是在思考和进取,走在成功的道路上。反之,固化思维带来的结果则可能是灾难性的,对于个人的成长和社会的进步毫无帮助,是我们需要摒弃的一种思维。 一、什么是成长性思维? 成长性思维(Growth Mindset)是一种相信能力和智慧可以通过努力、学习和坚持不断提升的思维方式。拥有这种思维的人会积极面对挑战,将失败视为成长的机会,并不断寻求自我突破。 不仅如此,拥有成长性思维的人往往会选择开放与包容,更倾向于信任与合作。这是为什么呢? 成长性思维的根本来源是互爱和开放精神。真正的成长需要包容、多元化的视角和对他人的理解,而这些特质都建立在互爱的基础上。 当人们关心彼此,他们会创造一个自由交流思想的环境,在这个环境里,错误不是失败,而是学习的契机,个体也会更愿意冒险尝试。互爱促使人们尊重不同观点、倾听他人意见,并保持持续学习的心态,这些都是成长性思维的核心。 另外,基于现实的乐观精神也是成长性思维的重要组成部分。在保持积极态度的同时,客观看待现实,避免盲目高估自己。能做到这一点,人们就更有可能通过努力、策略、专注和坚持去应对挑战,变得更加坚韧。 二、成长性思维 VS 固化思维 有固化思维(Fixed Mindset)的人则是认为智力和能力是有限的,无法通过努力显著提升。面对挑战时,他们往往感到沮丧,比如认为自己“能力差”或者“愚蠢”,因此更倾向于逃避或者放弃。 他们害怕失去,不敢尝试,抗拒反馈。他们倾向于并将失败视为自身能力不足的证明,而非成长的机会。 固化思维的本质来源于恐惧与傲慢。恐惧让人们害怕失败,担心失败会暴露自己的弱点,因此他们往往选择待在舒适区,不敢尝试新的挑战。 与此同时,傲慢让人们认为自己天生优越,因此不愿意承认错误,也不愿意接受新知识。如果一个人坚信自己已经比别人更优秀,他们就会拒绝改变,因为改变意味着他们需要重新审视自己,甚至可能推翻过去的认知。 恐惧和傲慢的结合,会让人停滞不前。有人害怕被证明是错的,所以拒绝接受新观点;有人自视甚高,不愿接受批评,也不愿意承认自己需要成长。久而久之,这种思维不仅会让个体失去进步的机会,也会阻碍他们在社会和职业中的长远发展。 成长性思维与固化思维的区别在于: 三、成长性思维为什么重要? 成长性思维对学习、事业成功和心理健康都有深远影响。 心理学家卡罗尔·德韦克(Carol Dweck)的研究表明,拥有成长性思维的学生更愿意接受挑战,在困难面前更具韧性,并最终取得更好的学术成绩。此外,神经科学的研究也证实了大脑的可塑性——人的智能和技能是可以持续发展的。 在教育之外,成长性思维还能增强适应能力和抗压能力。在不断变化的世界里,那些愿意接受挑战,并把挫折当作学习机会的人,更能适应不确定性。 此外,成长性思维还可以降低焦虑和抑郁的风险,因为它让人们不再把自己定义为“失败者”,而是专注于如何从失败中成长。 成长性思维和固化思维不止存在于个体身上,同样的逻辑也适用于地区和社会的发展。不难发现,越是排外的地方,人们的思想更偏向于固化和落后。而大城市往往是包容之地,不同群体的加入、不同观点的碰撞让一切更加欣欣向荣。 三、如何培养成长性思维? 很少有人天生具有成长性思维,主要来自于后天的环境引导和自我反思——这意味着每个人都能培养出成长性思维。 那么应该从何开始呢? 我们可以从觉察自己的思维模式开始: 如果你在以上的问题中,都选择了前者,说明你正在受固化思维的影响。 好消息是,你也可以通过觉察与训练,逐步让自己打破思维的局限性,而主动调整和重新选择自己的方向。 觉察到了自己的思维模式,你会意识到,自己可以做出更好的选择。对过去的反思将成为持续成长的肥料。 这需要长期的努力。最重要的是,每个人都应该拥抱自己内心的爱,让积极和热爱驱动自身能力与事业的成长。 假如你是一个教育工作者,你应该如何培养学生的成长性思维呢? 教师的语言和给予学生的表扬方式对学生有潜移默化的影响。直至今天,我依然常常听到不当的指导语言,这些话在伤害孩子的思维发展和感情,很多老师对此却缺乏明确的认识。 以下是一些培养学生成长性思维的教学策略: 培养成长性思维是一个长期的过程。成长型思维原则应当融入所有科目和课程,帮助学生在各个层面鼓励积极的自我对话和基于努力的表扬。 通过培养成长性思维,人们可以在学习、事业和生活中实现更大的突破,并获得更充实的体验。互爱、开放、勇于尝试和坚持学习的态度,能帮助我们真正解锁自身潜力,让人生走向更广阔的未来。

read more

Related Content

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
View All Content