What Is Civilization, the Mysterious Concept that is So Hard to Grasp?

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 7, 2024
This article comes from a volunteer meeting where Daohe shared her insight on the concept of “civilization”. As a member of the volunteer group, I took notes during the discussion and wrote this article later. Please excuse any incomplete or missing details in the article. Introduction Recently, while explaining the vision and mission of Yicheng […]

This article comes from a volunteer meeting where Daohe shared her insight on the concept of “civilization”. As a member of the volunteer group, I took notes during the discussion and wrote this article later. Please excuse any incomplete or missing details in the article.

Introduction

Recently, while explaining the vision and mission of Yicheng Commonweal to others, I noticed something quite strange. Many people lack the understanding of civilization, or they are confused about the concept. So what exactly is civilization? Why is it so abstract and so hard to understand?

When people lack a proper perspective on civilization, it becomes difficult to see the direction of society. This article discusses the concept of civilization and why Yicheng Commonweal was established to promote the advancement of civilization.

I. The Definition of Civilization

Civilization is the sum of the physical and spiritual achievements that human societies accumulate over time. It includes the formation and evolution of political and economic systems, social institutions and laws, culture, and value systems. Civilization is like a house that guarantees the people living inside. The structure, size, and quality of the civilization house—shaped by governance, education, culture, and social welfare—directly influence people’s living conditions and mental state. In essence, the average quality of life and collective well-being in a society depend on its civilization.

Like houses, civilizations vary greatly in quality. Some are like shabby shacks, unable to provide basics for its residents. In contrast, some are like luxurious villas, offering comfort and security. The pursuit of a better life is at the heart of the constant advancement of civilization, which is the driving force behind the continuous advancement of social civilization.

The question is, how do we evaluate the level of civilization in society? The more civilized a society is, the better its systems and institutions support the growth and well-being of its people. A highly civilized society fosters the values and practices of goodness, morality, love, and dignity, encouraging flourishing development across all aspects. In contrast, societies with lower levels of civilization often trample on these values, promote toxic ideologies, and undermine people’s well-being, creating a vicious cycle of decline. 

In a more civilized society, individuals receive greater social support, requiring less effort to achieve success and happiness in life. Instead, in less developed societies, individuals face significant barriers to personal growth and prosperity, often requiring an extraordinary amount of effort—sometimes hundreds or thousands of times more — just to attain what others may take for granted. In these societies, people usually suffer from all sorts of great hardship. 

Once you comprehend what civilization truly means, it becomes clear how societies differ in their levels of civilization. Even now, the disparity in civilization levels between nations and districts is clear, directly corresponding to differences in overall well-being. This can be clearly seen in migration trends. While people may not always have a clear understanding of civilization, the pursuit of well-being is universal, motivating many to move to more developed societies.

II. Civilization Needs to Be Maintained and Upgraded

Without a proper perspective and scale of understanding civilization, it is difficult for people to comprehend the flow of human history and the future direction of civilization, which may result in a few common misconceptions. 

1. The Optimistic View: Observing the economic and scientific achievements of human societies in the past, some people become blindly optimistic, so they believe as society “naturally” develops, human society will keep developing itself.

2. The Pessimistic View: After witnessing the decline and collapse of civilizations throughout history and all sorts of man-made disasters, some conclude that human nature is inherently evil and that human actions are essentially pointless. Seeing this historical pattern, they predict that civilization will inevitably fall again.

3. The Apathy View: Unable to see clearly, some choose to shut their eyes and avoid contemplating these issues. They believe that individual lives have no connection to societal development and that individual success depends solely on personal efforts. Alternatively, they may lack vision for the future and content themselves with living in the present.

In reality, all three of these mindsets are problematic and can lead to  poor life decisions. The development of civilization is not a natural or automatic process. Instead, it is shaped by the choices of individuals within society. History is merely the result and feedback of those choices and actions. The progress of civilization depends on people who are thoughtful, engaged, and dedicated to addressing societal issues. Without their efforts and critical thinking, society will face difficulties in progressing.

When the overwhelming majority of people decide to tolerate and enable evil, rather than pushing for the advancement of goodness, the forces of corruption will rise, causing society to deteriorate. In contrast, when people choose good and virtue, resisting evil and injustice, society will move forward in a positive direction, creating benefits and hope for its people.

Inaction is, in itself, a decision. If people are dissatisfied with their circumstances but choose not to make changes — simply conforming to the status quo — they allow evil to spread and invite man-made disasters. If civilization does not progress toward a better direction, it will stagnate or even regress. As British historian Arnold Toynbee said, Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.

As a result, it is crucial for individuals to actively maintain and advance the various systems and institutions within society, including the economy, politics, education, law, culture, and welfare systems. This kind of social practice is what will steadily elevate people’s living standards, bringing sustained happiness and hope, and enabling the “house” of civilization to grow and upgrade.

III. The Different Stages of Human Civilization

Throughout history, human society has progressed through various stages of civilization, each marked by distinct characteristics and systems. These stages can broadly be divided into three major categories: the Slave Society, the Feudal Society, the Capitalist Society.  In the future, we will soon witness the emergence of the Social Citizen Society.

1. The Slave Society: The system is based on the complete dehumanization of one group for the benefit of another. The fundamental belief in this society is that some people are meant to serve others, and the slaves themselves internalize this belief, seeing themselves as inherently subordinate.

2. The Feudal Society: This system was built upon coercion, deception, and the consolidation of power by a select few. People were expected to focus solely on their own lives and the well-being of their families, showing little interest in the larger social or political changes occurring around them.

3. The Capitalist Society: This system is based on business employment, commercial transactions, labor exploitation, and financial manipulation, where power is concentrated in the hands of capitalists and financiers. People are at risk of being exploited by capital interests and deceived by financial institutions. The values of freedom, equality, democracy are widely recognized and people participate in politics mainly to protect their personal interests as well as secure their rights.

4. The Social Citizen Society: It is based on a capitalist financial system that operates on principles of cooperation, mutual benefit, co-creation, and shared prosperity. Compared with the current capitalist system, it mainly serves the interests of social citizens instead of capitalists. The ideals of freedom, democracy, equality, and creativity resonate deeply, empowering people to become the leaders and catalysts of social progress.

The differences between these stages of civilization have led to significant disparities in the quality of life and cultural values around the world. While some societies on Earth are heading towards social citizen society, some are still struggling in the model of feudal society, leading to great gap in quality of life and cultural values among different regions. It is a heartbreaking fact, and the reason why we are so committed to civilization education.

IV. Faith is the Soul of Civilization

Faith remains a constant force in human civilization, like the sun in the sky—unaffected by progress or decline. Faith is the driving force behind humanity’s pursuit of goodness and virtue. It is the deep, inherent choice within the soul of every individual. Without the support and guidance of faith, acts of kindness and goodness are hard to sustain. In societies where civilization is underdeveloped, faith serves as the only form of salvation, providing the motivation for people to act and the spiritual strength to guide societal transformation.

Faith is not limited to religions. It encompasses any value system that promotes goodness and virtue. Some may not believe in any religion but instead hold firm to ideals such as freedom, equality, democracy, and justice. These beliefs guide individuals toward societal progress. This is why Yicheng Commonweal focuses on enhancing and developing faith—recognizing all beliefs that inspire positive change.

V. Education Shapes the Future of Civilization

Education is the key to nurturing the next generation of leaders. The security and well-being of society in the future will depend on the systems we build today, as well as the quality of the education we provide. This obvious truth is often overlooked, yet it is the key to long-term social stability and progress. Education equips individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to lead and innovate, and these leaders are the ones who will shape the future direction of society.

Outdated education systems produce individuals who are ill-prepared to meet the demands of an ever-evolving world. When education fails to adapt to new challenges and emerging needs, it creates a gap between what society requires and the talents it produces. This disconnect leads to stagnation, where social development lacks momentum and the potential for future progress diminishes. 

On the other hand, by nurturing individuals who are equipped with the right skills, values, and critical thinking abilities, education fosters innovation, creativity, and leadership, enabling society to evolve and thrive.

Daohe also shared her insight on some of the myths people have about civilization.

1. The level of civilization in society is determined by its economic progress.

Economic development is a necessary condition for the progress of civilization and a reflection of that progress, but it is not a sufficient condition. A more advanced civilization tends to nurture greater intellectual freedom and creativity, encouraging people to work together, share, and support one another, which drives further economic progress.

However, as mentioned earlier, civilization encompasses various systems and institutions within a society. While the economic system is a key aspect, it is just one part of the broader system. Political structures, cultural norms, and other systems—both tangible and intangible—also impact the progression of civilization and shape a society’s development. Even in a society with a strong economy, if other systems fall behind, it weakens the ability to handle risks and undermines the potential for long-term progress.

A historical example can be found in the Punic Wars, fought between the Roman and Carthaginian Empires in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE. Despite Carthage’s commercial prosperity and naval power, it was defeated by Rome, which had less economic and military strength. What factors contributed to Carthage’s defeat?

The reason behind Rome’s triumph lies in the fact that, except for its naval and economic strength, it was far more advanced than Carthage in key areas such as politics, law, and diplomacy. Moreover, Roman society was bound together by a strong sense of patriotism, where the preservation of the state was the ultimate value. This cultural cohesion gave them the strength to endure hardships and continue fighting, even when facing significant losses.

On the other hand, Carthage was prosperous—its wealth was precisely what made it a target for Roman expansion. However, rather than relying on a dedicated citizen army, Carthage hired foreign mercenaries, as its people were more concerned with commercial gain than defending their nation. As a result, the mercenaries lacked loyalty, and some even betrayed Carthage during their defeats by switching allegiance to Rome. Even the military genius of Hannibal failed to save Carthage, as the government failed to give him the support he needed, which contributed to the eventual collapse of the empire.

This makes it clear that while economic development offers significant benefits to society, it must be supported by other systems. Without this, economic progress may become a destructive temptation for others. Even without external pressures, a society that neglects cultural and intellectual growth can become lost in confusion and disillusionment, paving the way for corruption to flourish.

2. Civilization is the moral level of a society. In primitive tribes, the system was generally communal, with no appearance or division of social classes, making primitive tribes more “civilized”.

Firstly, during the time of primitive tribes, human societies were small in scale and characterized by low productivity. Advanced systems of labor division and collaboration had yet to develop. Living relied on direct sharing of resources and basic production methods, not on the complex organization seen in technologically, culturally, and economically advanced societies. Therefore, discussing the “level of civilization” at this point in history is irrelevant.

Secondly, the lifestyle and relationships among members of the tribe were more shaped by the need to survive than by any high moral standards. To survive, they adopted the most practical approach to resource sharing given their circumstances.

Directly associating the resource allocation systems of primitive tribes with moral standards or the level of civilization is a misinterpretation and oversimplification of the concept of “civilization.” Civilization’s true essence lies in how efficiently a society organizes and manages itself to enhance the well-being of all its members while safeguarding individual interests.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

なぜ権力は民衆の福祉を改善する提案に耳を貸さないのか:世界的権力の無関心、その制度的解剖

なぜ権力は民衆の福祉を改善する提案に耳を貸さないのか:世界的権力の無関心、その制度的解剖

Kishou · Jul 25, 2025

一、序論:権力の「善意による覚醒」に期待するのは、もうやめよう 公共の危機が勃発し、社会問題が急増するたび、人々は決まってこう叫びます。「政府は民衆の声を聞くべきだ」と。 しかし、歴史と現実は繰り返し証明しています—— 彼らは聞くことはない。聞きたくもなく、聞くことが許さず、そもそも本気で聞くつもりなどないのだ、と。 私たちが暴くべきは、その背後にある制度的ロジックです。 政府がもし少数者のためだけに奉仕するのなら、必然的に民衆の幸福を厄介な重荷、甚だしきは脅威と見なすようになります。 このような構造の中では、民衆の生活を改善しようとするいかなる善意や提案も、「必要とされない妨害」でしかありません。 これはどこか特定の国の問題でも、特定の指導者の品性の問題でもありません。 これは、世界中のあらゆる場所で見られる、制度的な慣性なのです。 二、なぜ提案は採用されないのか? それは「特権の安定構造」を揺るがすからだ 1. 聞き入れることは、構造的欠陥を認めることを意味する 政府がもし庶民からの提案を一つでも採用したなら、それは以下のことを認めるに等しいのです。 そしてこれこそが、特権システムが最も容認できないことなのです。 2. 聞き入れることは、資源の流れを変える可能性がある 民衆に有益な提案のほとんどは、次のことを要求します: そしてこれらの提案こそ、まさに権力者や富裕層が決して譲歩したくない一線なのです。 三、グローバルな実例:生活改善の提案は、いかにして組織的に無視されるか 以下の実例は、異なる文化、制度、国家から来ていますが、共通の現象を明らかにしています。権力が少数者のためだけに奉仕する時、民衆は政策決定の輪から排除されるのです。 √ケース1:アメリカ——40年間否決され続ける銃規制法案 アメリカでは毎年4万人以上の市民が銃によって命を落としていますが、厳格な銃規制を主張するすべての法案は、議会によって否決されてきました。 理由はきわめてシンプルです。 民衆の安全を求める声は、常に特権集団の既得権益の前に敗れ去るのです。 √ケース2:インド——農業三法案への農民の抗議、政府は長年無視 2020年以降、インドの数十万人の農民が農業自由化法案に反対しました。彼らが明確に指摘したのは以下の点です。 政府は一年以上にわたる抗議を無視しただけでなく、暴力による強制排除や、水道・インターネットの遮断といった手段さえ用いました。 民衆が首都を数ヶ月にわたり封鎖するに至って、ようやく一部法案を渋々撤回しましたが、補償や関係修復については一切語られませんでした。 これは典型的な「聞かず、見ず、変えず、強大な圧力によってのみ譲歩する」姿勢です。 √ ケース3:フランス——民意に逆らう年金改革の強行採決 2023年、フランス政府は「財政の持続可能性を確保するため」という理由で、議会を迂回し、定年退職年齢の引き上げを柱とする年金改革を強行しました。 しかし、 「民主主義の模範」と称されるフランスでさえ、権力は民衆の意思よりも、資本の安定を優先したのです。 √ ケース4:ブラジル——アマゾンの先住民の叫びは、決して聞き届けられない 数十年もの間、ブラジルの先住民は、アマゾン熱帯雨林の伐採を制限するよう政府に繰り返し訴えてきました。 政府は公には何度も環境保護を約束しましたが、裏では「合法を装った」採掘許可を出し、罰則を形骸化させ、時には企業を守るために軍隊まで動かしました。 民衆の生態系保護を求める声は、外資と一次産品輸出による短期的な利益の誘惑に勝てなかったのです。 √ケース5:フィリピン——貧困層からの改善提案は「反政府的言論」と見なされる フィリピン・マニラのスラム街の地域組織は、長年にわたり次のことを訴えてきました。 これらの提案は決して急進的なものではありません。しかし、政府からはしばしば「国家の安定を揺るがす」と指摘され、一部のNGOは「潜在的な転覆勢力」としてリストアップされることさえあります。 民主政体の下でさえ、貧しい人々が提出した合理的な改善提案は、社会の安定を維持するという名目の下で、弾圧の対象となるのです。 四、制度の深層構造:なぜ彼らは、そもそも「民衆の声を聞く必要がない」のか 1. 政治権力は、とうの昔に資本の利益ネットワークに「捕獲」されている 多くの国の政治システムは、表向きは民主体制でも、実質的には財閥、多国籍企業、金融資本と固く結びついています。 2. 行政システムは、「権力者への応答を優先する」という慣性を形成している かくして政策は何度となく変わりますが、民衆の生活が「考慮の範囲」に入ることはないのです。 五、良い提案をすることは、自らを「危険人物」だと暴露するに等しい 多くの国で、草の根のNGO、学者、コミュニティ活動家が「提案が的確すぎ、正論すぎる」という理由で、社会の周縁に追いやられ、誤解され、時には弾圧されてきました。 提案者の専門性と理性こそが、皮肉にも彼らの無関心さを証明してしまうのです。 六、改善策を知らないのではなく、「公平な社会」を創造する気がないのだ […]

为什么绝不会听从改善人民福祉的办法:全球权力冷漠的制度剖析

为什么绝不会听从改善人民福祉的办法:全球权力冷漠的制度剖析

Kishou · Jul 25, 2025

一、引言:别再期待权力“善意觉醒” 每当公共危机爆发、社会问题激增,总有人呼吁:“政府该听听人民的声音了。” 但历史和现实反复证明—— 他们不会听、不想听、不允许听,也从未真正打算听。 而最该被揭露的,是这背后的制度逻辑: 政府如果只是为少数人服务,就必然将人民的福祉当作累赘,甚至威胁。 在这样的结构中,任何改善人民生活的好意与建议,都是“不被需要的干扰”。 这不是某个国家的问题,也不是某个领导人的心术问题。 这是一种制度性惯性,全球皆然。 二、为何不采纳?因为采纳就动摇了“特权稳定态” 1. 听进去,意味着承认结构错误 政府若采纳一个来自底层民众的方案,就等于承认: 而这是特权系统最不能容忍的。 2. 听进去,就可能改变资源流向 大多数有益于人民的建议,都会要求: 而这些建议,恰恰是权贵们不愿让步的底线。 三、全球案例:改善人民生活的建议是如何被系统性无视的? 以下这些真实案例,来自不同文化、制度与国家,却揭示了同一现象:当权力只为少数人服务,人民就被排除在政策之外。 案例一:美国——枪支管控立法40年被拒 美国每年死于枪支的平民超4万人,但所有主张严格枪支管控的提案都被“国会山”拒绝。 为什么? 人民的安全呼吁,始终输给了特权集团的既得利益。 案例二:印度——农民抗议三法案,政府长年拒听 2020年起,印度数十万农民反对农业自由化法案,他们明确指出: 政府不但无视长达一年以上的抗议,甚至使用暴力清场、断水断网。 直到民众封堵首都数月,才勉强废除部分法案——但补偿、修复无从谈起。 这是典型的:不听、不看、不改,直到被强压才让步。 案例三:法国——养老金改革逆民意强推 2023年,法国政府绕过议会,强行推行延迟退休年龄的养老金改革,理由是“确保财政可持续”。 但: 在以“民主模范”著称的法国,权力依然优先保障资本稳定,而非人民意愿。 √案例四:巴西——亚马逊森林的原住民求救从未被听见 几十年来,巴西原住民多次呼吁政府限制对亚马逊雨林的采伐: 政府多次公开承诺环保,但私下通过“合法伪装”的开采许可、淡化处罚、甚至动用军队保护公司。 人民的生态呼声,敌不过外资和大宗商品出口创汇的短期诱惑。 案例五:菲律宾——贫民改善建议被视为“反政府言论” 菲律宾马尼拉贫民区的社区组织长期呼吁: 这些建议并非激进,但常常被政府指为“动摇国家稳定”,甚至有NGO被列为“潜在颠覆势力”。 在一个民主政体下,穷人提出的合理改善建议,成了维稳打击对象。 四、制度深层结构:为什么他们根本“用不着听人民”? 1. 政治权力早已被资本利益网络“俘获” 很多国家的政治系统,表面上是民主体制,实质上早被财团、跨国公司、金融资本捆绑。 2. 行政体系已形成“回应权贵优先”的惯性 于是政策一变再变,但人民的生活从不在“考虑范围”内。 五、提出好建议,其实是在“自我暴露” 很多国家的基层NGO、学者、社群行动者,就是因为“建议太好、道理太清晰”,而被边缘、被误导、甚至被打压。 因为提案者的专业与理性,反而证明了他们的冷漠。 六、不是不懂改善办法,而是不打算创造“公平社会” 他们不是没有能力改革,而是: 一个服务少数人的制度,是不可能产生大多数人受益的政策的。 哪怕提出千条妙策,只会被政权当作“应付危机的素材”,用完即弃。 […]

read more

Related Content

Volunteer Manual
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 4, 2024
Welcome to Our Volunteer Team! Thank you for choosing to join Yicheng Commonweal as a volunteer! We are committed to advancing social civilization, public welfare, and collective well-being through our collective efforts, while spreading love and warmth. This welcome guide will help you integrate smoothly into our team, understand your key responsibilities and expectations, and […]
Yicheng Commonweal in Action: Empowering Volunteers to Become Future Organizers and Leaders
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 19, 2024
At Yicheng Commonweal, we are dedicated to continuous exploration and innovation. Our volunteers share a deep sense of social responsibility and a strong capacity for personal and spiritual growth. Here, volunteers contribute to our cause through their actions while developing the ability to drive social progress. We aim to transform volunteers into future organizers and […]
A governance model centered on complete citizens
A governance model centered on complete citizens
Avatar photo
Daohe · Aug 7, 2025
The institutional evolution and historical trajectory of civil politics Produced by Yicheng Commonweal To those who truly love their country I. Opening: Who does true governance belong to? In today’s world, nearly every nation inscribes grand slogans such as “putting people first” or “rule of law” into its political declarations. These phrases are treated as […]
Don’t let a narrow mindset hinder the journey of good deeds
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 17, 2025
On the journey of advancing public welfare, we often encounter the criticism: “Your charity seems too religious.” This is a classic example of a narrow perspective—one that is influenced by bias, limitations, or even misunderstanding, and fails to truly consider the viewpoint of those involved in charitable efforts. To better explain our original intentions, it […]
View All Content